Quote:
Originally Posted by DG
Read the original post.
|
Given the coach's own words, it's #22 for #25. Absent any mention of other players, that's what it is.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DG
There was no mention of batting infractions, only that #22 replaced #25 in LF. There is no batting order infraction mentioned in the post. One must conclude that only fielding changes have been made illegally.
|
How do you arrive at this conclusion? Since when are only fielding changes affected by a substitution?
Quote:
Originally Posted by DG
#8 has to leave. DH who was batting for him entered on defense. Defensive player must leave the game when his DH enters on defense.
|
Cite? Or is it that the DH is forbidden to enter while the fielder for which he is batting is still fielding?
Thu Apr 23, 2009, 10:50pm
Similar Threads
Threaded Mode
