The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Wed May 22, 2002, 10:51am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Newburgh NY
Posts: 1,822
Originally posted by PAblue87

What is the proper interpretation on a batter interfering with a catcher attempting to retire a stealing runner at 2nd. Does the catcher have to throw the ball in order to have interference, or can there be som sort of an attempt?

In order for interference to be called there has to be a play or attempted play. A play is defined by the act of the defense trying to put out a runner.

In your situation we do not need a throw, but we need some indication that F2 is making a play. In other words, has F2 come-up ready to throw or did F2 just stand there holding the ball.

If there was no play or attempted play then there is no interference.

Pete Booth
__________________
Peter M. Booth
Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:36pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1