|
Pete can we get a little more technical on that. By this I mean, there is uncertainty on my part of the use of the word "attempted play" verses "play". Although this may be purely sematical, OBR 6.06C mentions only the word "play".
2002 BRD pg 132. Note 236 states, "The guideline at all levels is: The umpire will stop play ""IF"" the catchers throw does not directly retire the runner".
I know BRD is not gospel, (sorry Carl) but I feel that the actual act of making the play is important in this situation and I (may be wrong) belive that it is implied here.
This same question came up in our association meeting and I feel that it is confusing to tell new officials that a attempt alone by the catcher, is solid ground for calling the interference. Mabey there is really no carte blanche, black and white guideline for this answer however, I have a tough time assuming the intent of a play that never happened.
Is there any more guideance or input we can get on this?
Thanks
|