The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jul 02, 2008, 08:05am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 323
Send a message via AIM to aceholleran
Take it that the ball is over foul territory in the air when INT occurs. I knew we'd have some differences on this! Let's hear more!

Ace
__________________
There is no such thing as idiot-proof, only idiot-resistant.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jul 02, 2008, 09:02am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,222
Quote:
Originally Posted by aceholleran
Take it that the ball is over foul territory in the air when INT occurs. I knew we'd have some differences on this! Let's hear more!

Ace
It's been discussed several times on this (or other) sites -- if I could figure out the proper search criteria, I'd post a link.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jul 02, 2008, 09:37am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Posts: 3,100
This thread discusses OBR and others.

Interference over Foul Territory

Where is it in the Fed book? I can't find it.
__________________
greymule
More whiskey—and fresh horses for my men!
Roll Tide!

Last edited by greymule; Wed Jul 02, 2008 at 09:42am.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jul 02, 2008, 10:24am
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Lakeside, California
Posts: 6,724
Quote:
Originally Posted by greymule

Where is it in the Fed book? I can't find it.
Rule 7-4-1f.
__________________
Matthew 15:14, 1 Corinthians 1:23-25
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jul 02, 2008, 11:06am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Posts: 3,100
Would Fed rule any differently if the INT was an obvious attempt to break up a double play? For example, what if an R1 had been stealing on the pitch, and R3 grabbed F5's glove just before the ball hit the glove over foul territory and just as R1 was sliding into 2B?
__________________
greymule
More whiskey—and fresh horses for my men!
Roll Tide!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jul 02, 2008, 12:46pm
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Lakeside, California
Posts: 6,724
Quote:
Originally Posted by greymule
Would Fed rule any differently if the INT was an obvious attempt to break up a double play? For example, what if an R1 had been stealing on the pitch, and R3 grabbed F5's glove just before the ball hit the glove over foul territory and just as R1 was sliding into 2B?
7-4-1f has to do with foul fly ball. 8-4-1h and 8-4-2g are the rules which apply to double play situations.
__________________
Matthew 15:14, 1 Corinthians 1:23-25
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Shooting Foul with Technical Foul / How Many FTs? rgncjn Basketball 5 Mon Jan 08, 2007 03:29am
Personal Foul, then Technical Foul jdw3018 Basketball 7 Sat Dec 02, 2006 05:35am
Foul tip caught, foul ball, or out? bossman72 Baseball 9 Sun Jul 09, 2006 11:03pm
offensive foul, defensive foul or no call? thereluctantref Basketball 2 Mon Mar 13, 2006 01:12pm
Anger over referee's foul calls triggers a bigger foul after game BktBallRef Basketball 10 Mon Mar 06, 2006 02:36am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:08pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1