|
|
|
Tue Jun 03, 2008, 03:22pm
|
|||
|
|||
Bruno,
This is properly ruled a foul ball. You will find nothing in the text of the OBR rules that says so, but ALL interpretations manuals agree that "foul" is the proper ruling. JM
__________________
Finally, be courteous, impartial and firm, and so compel respect from all. 
|
|
Tue Jun 03, 2008, 04:53pm
|
|||
|
|||
|
The ball hit the bat through no action on the part of the batter, so he is not penalized. The rule does not provide for a ball hitting a bat. Had the batter dropped the bat and hit the ball with it, then 6.05(h) is enforced. The bat then would have hit the ball, as is stated in the rule.
__________________
Matthew 15:14, 1 Corinthians 1:23-25
|
 |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Wrong Way! Wrong Goal? | Rick Durkee | Basketball | 6 | Mon Nov 05, 2007 05:57pm |
| When I'm Wrong, I'm wrong: Interference is better without intent | wadeintothem | Softball | 48 | Thu Apr 12, 2007 12:58am |
| Interpretation. | WinterWillie | Basketball | 22 | Thu Dec 01, 2005 02:55pm |
| New interpretation | M&M Guy | Basketball | 21 | Fri Jan 21, 2005 01:16pm |
| FED interpretation | David Emerling | Baseball | 2 | Thu Feb 06, 2003 08:03am |
Hybrid Mode
