The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Fri Mar 08, 2002, 01:03pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Posts: 3,100
Case book 2002, 8.1.1D: "When may a batter be hit by a pitch and not be awarded first base? Ruling: (1) The pitch is a strike, (2) the batter does not attempt to avoid being hit or (3) with no runners on base, the pitch is illegal and is not ball four."

I'm concerned about (3). Of course, "with no runners on base" is part of the definition of "illegal pitch." (2-18-1)

A pitcher can (unintentionally) bean a batter with an illegal pitch and get away with a ball rather than a hit batter?

6-2-1: "PENALTY: For defacing the ball . . . the ball is dead immediately. The umpire may eject the pitcher. If such defaced ball is pitched and then detected, it is an illegal pitch."

First pitch to batter hits him. Batter goes to 1B. Umpire determines that pitcher had discolored ball with dirt. Umpire determines pitch was illegal and calls batter back to box. Count now 1-0.

Pitcher delivers 0-2 pitch to batter. Umpire sees spit flying off ball. Batter hits ball over fence. Stay here, batter. Count is 1-2.

These situations can't be correct, and I wouldn't call them this way. But somebody tell me what I've missed.
__________________
greymule
More whiskey—and fresh horses for my men!
Roll Tide!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Fri Mar 08, 2002, 01:45pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,071
Quote:
Originally posted by greymule
Case book 2002, 8.1.1D: "When may a batter be hit by a pitch and not be awarded first base? Ruling: (1) The pitch is a strike, (2) the batter does not attempt to avoid being hit or (3) with no runners on base, the pitch is illegal and is not ball four."

I'm concerned about (3). Of course, "with no runners on base" is part of the definition of "illegal pitch." (2-18-1)
Well, the "with no runners on base" is part of the definition. Of course, so is "with runners on base."

Quote:
A pitcher can (unintentionally) bean a batter with an illegal pitch and get away with a ball rather than a hit batter?

6-2-1: "PENALTY: For defacing the ball . . . the ball is dead immediately. The umpire may eject the pitcher. If such defaced ball is pitched and then detected, it is an illegal pitch."

First pitch to batter hits him. Batter goes to 1B. Umpire determines that pitcher had discolored ball with dirt. Umpire determines pitch was illegal and calls batter back to box. Count now 1-0.

Pitcher delivers 0-2 pitch to batter. Umpire sees spit flying off ball. Batter hits ball over fence. Stay here, batter. Count is 1-2.

These situations can't be correct, and I wouldn't call them this way. But somebody tell me what I've missed.
You haven't missed anything. It's part of the FED ruling on balks and illegal pitches.

Change your examples to a balk (one that is not also an illegal pitch). You'd still kill the ball and not award first / allow the home run.

By rule, you'd do the same thing on the illegal pitch.

(TO be clear, I'm not advocating that you call it in the examples you gave. And, I'm not supporting the FED position that a balk / illegal pitch should be an immediate dead ball.)
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:27pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1