|
Wed Feb 20, 2008, 05:22pm
|
|||
|
|||
|
That's sort of like the play I had where the batter took one step backwards out of the box and got hit with a subsequent pickoff attempt by the catcher, where the play appeared to begin after the batter left the box.
In your post, I would say that if the runner from 3B has come far enough off so the play is developing on the pitch, it's INT, but if the play develops well after F2 has received the ball, it's not. Even then, did the batter in your OP stay in the box? If I'm the catcher, I'm sure not to hit the batter.
__________________
greymule More whiskey—and fresh horses for my men! Roll Tide! 
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Runner interference versus umpire interference | Jay R | Baseball | 1 | Thu Apr 28, 2005 07:00pm |
| interference??? | slowballbaker | Softball | 13 | Fri Apr 15, 2005 09:37pm |
| Interference or not | Carl Childress | Baseball | 16 | Sun Apr 10, 2005 09:04pm |
| Interference | carldog | Baseball | 6 | Thu Feb 10, 2005 09:47am |
| Interference | granny | Softball | 11 | Fri Jun 21, 2002 08:45am |
Threaded Mode
