intervening play

[DG]

Originally Posted by Rich Ives

See the 2006 BRD Item 273. Official Interpretation 186-273 by Fitzpatrick PBUC: "(c) The throw need not come from behind."

One.....

[mbyron]

Originally Posted by DG

One.....

singular sensation?

[GarthB]

Originally Posted by mbyron

singular sensation?

Thrilling combination?

[greymule]

Just got up the energy to look in Evans, which does say that the intervening play has to be at home plate.

[_Bruno_]

Originally Posted by greymule

Just got up the energy to look in Evans, which does say that the intervening play has to be at home plate.

that means, R2, 0 outs. F6 fields the ball and throws to F5 but the tag on R2 is late. F5 now fires to F3 but BR interferes by running inside the diamond. since the intervening play was not at homeplate R2 has go back to 2ndbase ?

[greymule]

that means, R2, 0 outs. F6 fields the ball and throws to F5 but the tag on R2 is late. F5 now fires to F3 but BR interferes by running inside the diamond. since the intervening play was not at homeplate R2 has go back to 2ndbase ?

Yes, according to Evans, under the definition of offensive interference. After presenting the intervening play at home and noting that the rule does score with subsequent BR INT (less than 2 out, of course), Evans says:

"A different ruling shall prevail if no play occurs at home plate prior to the batter runner's interference. In this case, the Note explaining offensive interference is valid, and all runners return to the bases last occupied at the time of the pitch."

[Bolding is mine.]

[Rich Ives]

Originally Posted by DG

One.....

One is enough if it comes from the right palce.

[DG]

Originally Posted by Rich Ives

One is enough if it comes from the right palce.

Do you consider this one..the right place?