Randy Marsh calling strikes

[GarthB]

Originally Posted by jimpiano

Your buddy's first line tells us all we need to know.

Yes...that when you said that those things NEVER happened in live broadcasts, you had no idea of what you were talking about or were lying through your teeth.

Try as you might, no one with an ounce of brains will accept your attempt to claim you were right. Your own words prevent that.

Remember these? Everyone else does.


From post #6:

"How in the world can any technology "doctor" sounds in a live event"?
That is called EDTING, but, to do that, it first has to be recorded."

From post #9

"But those sounds cannotbe alterted on a live broadcast."

From post 14

"But TV does not change sounds."

"…sports broadcasts are about giving the viewer the sounds of the game as heard by those in attendance.""

From post 17

"The sounds heard at home may be easier to hear , but they are the same sounds you would hear being close to the action at a live event. They are never altered or changed."

From post 22

"Ah, the capability exists. Certainly it does, but it is not used to change the sounds of the game."

"The swoosh at the tee is what you would hear standing next to Tiger."

From post 23

"I can tell you for a fact that no American network broadcast alters or changes the actual sounds heard at an event."

Trust me, it is the rest of us who are LOL.

[bobbybanaduck]

http://forum.officiating.com/profile...ignore&u=12530

[jimpiano]

Originally Posted by GarthB

Yes...that when you said that those things NEVER happened in live broadcasts, you had no idea of what you were talking about or were lying through your teeth.

Try as you might, no one with an ounce of brains will accept your attempt to claim you were right. Your own words prevent that.

Remember these? Everyone else does.


From post #6:

"How in the world can any technology "doctor" sounds in a live event"?
That is called EDTING, but, to do that, it first has to be recorded."

From post #9

"But those sounds cannotbe alterted on a live broadcast."

From post 14

"But TV does not change sounds."

"…sports broadcasts are about giving the viewer the sounds of the game as heard by those in attendance.""

From post 17

"The sounds heard at home may be easier to hear , but they are the same sounds you would hear being close to the action at a live event. They are never altered or changed."

From post 22

"Ah, the capability exists. Certainly it does, but it is not used to change the sounds of the game."

"The swoosh at the tee is what you would hear standing next to Tiger."

From post 23

"I can tell you for a fact that no American network broadcast alters or changes the actual sounds heard at an event."

Trust me, it is the rest of us who are LOL.

Your buddy explained it all.
Maybe you should reread his comments.

[GarthB]

Originally Posted by jimpiano

Your buddy explained it all.
Maybe you should reread his comments.

Yes, lets. In fact, let's line them up with yours.

Yours: ""But those sounds cannot be alterted on a live broadcast."

His: So, do we sweeten live sounds? Sure.

Yours: "But TV does not change sounds."

His: Yes, we sweeten the sounds of the tee shot on PGA broadcasts.

Yours: "The sounds heard at home may be easier to hear , but they are the same sounds you would hear being close to the action at a live event. They are never altered or changed."

His: As for the thought you relayed expressed by someone on the internet that the home viewer hears what the on-site fan hears, that's nonsense. The home viewer hears so much more than what the on-site fan hears, both "actual" sounds and sweetened or enhanced sounds.

Yours: "The swoosh at the tee is what you would hear standing next to Tiger."

His: We make the swing and the contact with the ball sound more powerful by upping the low mid-range a bit (800 Hz-1 KHz), dropping off the brightness of the upper range just a little (2.5 KHz-5KHz) and increasing the decay time of the impact with the ball very, very slightly.

Yours: "I can tell you for a fact that no American network broadcast alters or changes the actual sounds heard at an event."

His: Yes, we sweeten the sounds of the tee shot on PGA broadcasts.

I know, I know. Now you will claim that you and Larry agree. You will somehow in your little mind find a way to convince yourself that you never really said all those things.

You need help.

[jimpiano]

Originally Posted by GarthB

Yes, lets. In fact, let's line them up with yours.

Yours: ""But those sounds cannot be alterted on a live broadcast."

His: So, do we sweeten live sounds? Sure.

Yours: "But TV does not change sounds."

His: Yes, we sweeten the sounds of the tee shot on PGA broadcasts.

Yours: "The sounds heard at home may be easier to hear , but they are the same sounds you would hear being close to the action at a live event. They are never altered or changed."

His: As for the thought you relayed expressed by someone on the internet that the home viewer hears what the on-site fan hears, that's nonsense. The home viewer hears so much more than what the on-site fan hears, both "actual" sounds and sweetened or enhanced sounds.

Yours: "The swoosh at the tee is what you would hear standing next to Tiger."

His: We make the swing and the contact with the ball sound more powerful by upping the low mid-range a bit (800 Hz-1 KHz), dropping off the brightness of the upper range just a little (2.5 KHz-5KHz) and increasing the decay time of the impact with the ball very, very slightly.

Yours: "I can tell you for a fact that no American network broadcast alters or changes the actual sounds heard at an event."

His: Yes, we sweeten the sounds of the tee shot on PGA broadcasts.

I know, I know. Now you will claim that you and Larry agree. You will somehow in your little mind find a way to convince yourself that you never really said all those things.

You need help.

English seems to be a second language for you.

[GarthB]

Originally Posted by jimpiano

English seems to be a second language for you.

And you and the truth are, at best, very occasional acquaintances.

[jimpiano]

Originally Posted by GarthB

And you and the truth are, at best, very occasional acquaintances.

It appears from comments from your peers that is more a problem for you.

[GarthB]

Originally Posted by jimpiano

It appears from comments from your peers that is more a problem for you.

First, you would have to know me to know what a peer of mine would be.

On the other hand, we can just let your words speak for themselves:

"But those sounds cannot be alterted on a live broadcast."

"I can tell you for a fact that no American network broadcast alters or changes the actual sounds heard at an event."

[giggle] I love that one.