Interference, Obstruction or Train Wreck??

[GarthB]

Originally Posted by canadaump6

Why anyone would want to put fitump on their ignore list, other than the fact that they can't keep up with his insights, is beyond me.

That's the problem. It IS beyond you, whereas a thinking, experienced umpire would know why.

Haven't you ever wondered why only F-ump and another troll or two support your error laden posts while the rest of the posters, including the more reasonable ones, recognize them for what they are?

[mbyron]

Originally Posted by GarthB

That's the problem. It IS beyond you, whereas a thinking, experienced umpire would know why.

Haven't you ever wondered why only F-ump and another troll or two support your error laden posts while the rest of the posters, including the more reasonable ones, recognize them for what they are?

Almost correct, GB. Many of the rest of us (reasonable or not) never see his posts.

As for the OP, I'm a little late to the party but agree that all 3 situations are interference. The fielder's protection while fielding a batted ball (even if deflected) is extremely strong.

[Interested Ump]

Originally Posted by GarthB
That's the problem. It IS beyond you, whereas a thinking, experienced umpire would know why.

Haven't you ever wondered why only F-ump and another troll or two support your error laden posts while the rest of the posters, including the more reasonable ones, recognize them for what they are?

Originally Posted by mbyron

Almost correct, GB. Many of the rest of us (reasonable or not) never see his posts.

It is a shame that bright minds belittle their contributions by twittering like teenaged girls in a school bathroom and finding humor in abusing one of the very few, young participants on the forum. Speaking only for myself, I support education, critical discussion and maturity in action.