tibear,
The criteria to be used in determining whether this is interference or obstruction is whether, in the umpire's judgement, the F4 had a legitimate chance to retire a runner absent the collision.
If he he judged that he did, it's interference. If he judged that he didn't, it's obstruction.
Whether the ball is in flight or not or whether F4 is moving or standing still is at best peripherally relevant.
The only way you get two outs on the play is if the umpire judges both that the F4 had a play and that the R1 intentionally ran into him to break up the double play - possible, but a bit of a stretch in my opinion.
JM
P.S. Why on earth would you judge intent (on the part of R1) based on the F4 standing still?
__________________
Finally, be courteous, impartial and firm, and so compel respect from all.
|