The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Thu Aug 02, 2007, 01:31pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Posts: 3,100
Post Nothing wrong with MLB today . . .

After a scoreless first inning this afternoon, the White Sox scored 8 runs in the top of the second. In the bottom of the inning, the Yankees tied the score.
__________________
greymule
More whiskey—and fresh horses for my men!
Roll Tide!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Fri Aug 03, 2007, 04:36pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 1,606
And why no mention of a Padres game recently where 11 runs were scored in the top of the first inning, which, BTW, lasted 27 minutes?
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Fri Aug 03, 2007, 05:38pm
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Lakeside, California
Posts: 6,724
Quote:
Originally Posted by UMP25
And why no mention of a Padres game recently where 11 runs were scored in the top of the first inning, which, BTW, lasted 27 minutes?
Yeah, that was cool. The Padres put on this 11-run exhibition at the exact same time as Tony Gwynn was being inducted into the Hall of Fame. I had the PIP going and swapping back and forth. The Padres managed to hold on and win. I think it was 18 to 11.
__________________
Matthew 15:14, 1 Corinthians 1:23-25
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Fri Aug 03, 2007, 08:49pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Posts: 3,100
And why no mention of a Padres game recently where 11 runs were scored in the top of the first inning, which, BTW, lasted 27 minutes?

Yeah, that too.

Now I read that the 16 runs are the most ever scored in the second inning of a MLB game. And the Yankees hit 8 homers in another recent game. Even with all the great slugging teams they had, they had not hit 8 in one game since the 1930s.

Innings of 6, 7, 8, and more are so common now, and it seems that every day there's a game in which 25 runs score. Recently there was a double-header in which almost 50 runs scored—and one team was shut out in one of the games.

If the balls get live enough, and the pitching gets diluted enough, and the power alleys get short enough, and the steroids get prevalent enough . . .

And when I attend a Phillies game and see a pitcher stick out his bat and hit a line drive off the facing of the mezzanine in left center—a shot that one would have expected from Mickey Mantle or Frank Howard a few decades ago—I have to wonder whether MLB should simply throw in the towel and make it slow-pitch baseball with titanium bats.
__________________
greymule
More whiskey—and fresh horses for my men!
Roll Tide!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Fri Aug 03, 2007, 11:30pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 1,606
Quote:
Originally Posted by SanDiegoSteve
Yeah, that was cool. The Padres put on this 11-run exhibition at the exact same time as Tony Gwynn was being inducted into the Hall of Fame. I had the PIP going and swapping back and forth. The Padres managed to hold on and win. I think it was 18 to 11.
That's why God invented TIVO--no need to do that. Just flip between tuners, pausing each or recording one and flipping back and forth between said tuners.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Fri Aug 03, 2007, 11:38pm
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Lakeside, California
Posts: 6,724
Quote:
Originally Posted by UMP25
That's why God invented TIVO--no need to do that. Just flip between tuners, pausing each or recording one and flipping back and forth between said tuners.
I have a DVR, which is much like TIVO. I have but one TV (in this room) though, so I use the PIP feature. Your way sounds like too much work.
__________________
Matthew 15:14, 1 Corinthians 1:23-25
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Fri Aug 03, 2007, 11:46pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 1,606
Hardly. It's quite simple. Besides, TIVO's kick @ss over DVRs.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Fri Aug 03, 2007, 11:54pm
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Lakeside, California
Posts: 6,724
Well, I can't afford one so I'll have to take your word for it. Maybe Ellen Degeneres will give me one someday.
__________________
Matthew 15:14, 1 Corinthians 1:23-25
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Fri Aug 03, 2007, 11:55pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 1,606
The DirecTV/TIVO ones are (a) cheaper than standalone TIVOs and (b) much better.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Saw this today... GarthB Baseball 25 Tue Jun 12, 2007 11:30am
When I'm Wrong, I'm wrong: Interference is better without intent wadeintothem Softball 48 Thu Apr 12, 2007 12:58am
Today brandan89 Basketball 20 Tue Nov 30, 2004 03:39pm
Okay one for today. buddha69 Softball 6 Fri Jul 23, 2004 09:39pm
Well I had a first today!! Damian Basketball 7 Sat Apr 17, 2004 12:36pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:59am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1