|
|
|
Thu Jul 12, 2007, 02:09pm
|
|||
|
|||
|
From the Common Sense and Fair Play Rule Book:
What is R1 doing retreating to 1B? He is interfering with subsequent play. I don't see any "intent" mentioned in 7.09(d). Ace
__________________
There is no such thing as idiot-proof, only idiot-resistant. 
|
|
Thu Jul 12, 2007, 02:45pm
|
|||
|
|||
|
7.09(d) comment woes...
7.09d (and subsequent comment) has to do with a runner ADVANCING after being retired. I don't see how this situation falls into that comment, as I stated earlier in the thread. That comment seems to me as one for runners who are sliding into 2nd on a double play, etc.
Is there another casebook ruling that makes this situation, and everyone's certainty of no INT if not intentional, more clear? Or is everyone just pulling this interp from 7.09? I'm just having a hard time seeing how an R1 so stupid has a rule that protects him from INT 
|
 |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| It was fun again tonight! | refnrev | Basketball | 5 | Wed Jan 24, 2007 09:33am |
| Goofy situation | daveg144 | Basketball | 9 | Wed Nov 22, 2006 03:40pm |
| Had an IW tonight | ChickenOfNC | Football | 19 | Sun Oct 29, 2006 07:27pm |
| Goofy | tcblue13 | Softball | 5 | Sun Sep 10, 2006 08:21pm |
| Goofy ouf of bounds situation | ref32 | Basketball | 3 | Fri Dec 29, 2000 11:58am |
Hybrid Mode
