The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #16 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 31, 2007, 12:22pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 286
He probably had it in his hand at one time.
Jerry
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 31, 2007, 01:45pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 301
For reference the Jays claim that A-Rod Yelled "Mine" , which caused the rookie third baseman to step aside thinking he was called off by the shortstop.

I still think this is nothing in OBR, but it would be a judgement call as it did CONFUSE the Defensive player. The sames as F6 telling a just stealing runner a ball was foul when it wasn't.
__________________
3apps

"It isn't enough for an umpire merely to know what he's doing. He has to look as though he know what he's doing too." - National League Umpire Larry Goetz

"Boys, I'm one of those umpires that misses 'em every once in a while so if it's close, you'd better hit it."
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 31, 2007, 01:46pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 1,606
Quote:
Originally Posted by SanDiegoSteve
In OBR there is no such thing as verbal interference or obstruction (actually points not covered). A runner is simply referred to as "gullible" for not knowing the difference between his opponent and his coach. Carl Childress said that Bruce Froemming would penalize a runner for yelling "drop it" to a fielder under 9.01(c).
Why not simply penalize a runner for committing interference? Period. After all, is it not interference when a runner hinders or impedes a fielder from fielding a batted ball (in the situation at hand)? Plus, if we know that offensive interference can occur without contact, which it oftentimes does, then can't a runner intentionally yelling at a fielder and hindering said fielder from fielding be considered interference per se (forget this term of "verbal interference"--I wouldn't even use that adjective "verbal" in my explanation to the inevitably arguing coach or manager)?

Last edited by UMP25; Thu May 31, 2007 at 01:48pm.
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 31, 2007, 01:47pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Spring Hill, TN
Posts: 169
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigGuy
If there was a snake under 3b, how would F5 know it?
...that was no snake...
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 31, 2007, 01:49pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 1,606
Hey, hey there! Watch it. This is a family forum.
Reply With Quote
  #21 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 31, 2007, 02:25pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Posts: 3,100
(forget this term of "verbal interference"--I wouldn't even use that adjective "verbal" in my explanation to the inevitably arguing coach or manager)?

It is true that the strict meaning of verbal is simply "of, in, or by means of words." Therefore, a written letter or a stone-carved saying is a verbal communication, and editors of documents that could have legal consequences are careful to distinguish between verbal and oral. In general usage, though, verbal has come to mean oral, as in, "He gave me verbal assurance."

So if we had to go to court to argue "verbal interference," then "Drop it!" might qualify, but "Blagghhh!" might not, since it's not a word. Of course, we'd have an argument if a passing runner yelled "Irregardless!" and the startled fielder dropped the ball.

But let's not ensconce "oral interference" in the rule book.

If there was a snake under 3b, how would F5 know it?

That's enough out of you!
__________________
greymule
More whiskey—and fresh horses for my men!
Roll Tide!
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 31, 2007, 02:48pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,219
Send a message via AIM to TussAgee11
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jerry
"Verbal Obstruction"!!!!Jerry
Huh? we are talking about the offense doing something to the defense.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jerry
Has anyone actually asked MLB why A-Rod was called on it?
Huh? He wasn't.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jerry
Oh, yeh. 9.01(c) will certainly cover it.
No, but other rules and their interpretations at different levels may cover it.

...
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 31, 2007, 06:15pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 4,222
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jerry

Has anyone actually asked MLB why A-Rod was called on it? And what the ruling was? Oh, yeh. 9.01(c) will certainly cover it.

Jerry
There was no call. RIF
__________________
GB
Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jun 01, 2007, 12:14am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 1,577
Not calling it both ways?

Many of these "bush league" events are still legal today. I won't discuss rare tactics such as the defensive decoys employed by the Miami H-Canes' to win a CWS. I believe MLB fielder's are also allowed to block the runner's vision of a caught fly ball. A-Rod had an opportunity for 225 million pay "$$-backs" and the defense complains because it worked. My only question after this broo-ha-ha is whether the rules will be changed to prevent the runner from yelling "mine" in the future?

Last edited by SAump; Fri Jun 01, 2007 at 01:10am.
Reply With Quote
  #25 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jun 01, 2007, 07:29am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,019
Quote:
Originally Posted by SAump
I believe MLB fielder's are also allowed to block the runner's vision of a caught fly ball.
You might want to change this belief.
Reply With Quote
  #26 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jun 01, 2007, 08:26am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Posts: 3,100
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/01/sp...tml?ref=sports

Link to an article this morning about the A-Rod incident.
__________________
greymule
More whiskey—and fresh horses for my men!
Roll Tide!
Reply With Quote
  #27 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jun 01, 2007, 08:38am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 1,606
Quote:
Originally Posted by bob jenkins
You might want to change this belief.
Indeed. There will always be little ploys done by players--it's what makes the game more interesting and kinda fun, IMHO--but certain things are still illegal.
Reply With Quote
  #28 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jun 01, 2007, 07:05pm
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Lakeside, California
Posts: 6,724
A-Rod very bush league.
__________________
Matthew 15:14, 1 Corinthians 1:23-25
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
F2: Verbal 'interference'? Bluefoot Softball 19 Thu Jul 27, 2006 02:38pm
Do you ever call Verbal Interference? DaveASA/FED Softball 10 Tue May 24, 2005 04:48pm
Verbal Interference 2 Joe Kupka Softball 23 Mon Dec 01, 2003 01:23pm
verbal interference ??? ump11 Baseball 21 Mon Jun 02, 2003 06:24pm
verbal interference arkblue Softball 6 Fri May 09, 2003 04:15pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:01pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1