![]() |
|
|||
For reference the Jays claim that A-Rod Yelled "Mine" , which caused the rookie third baseman to step aside thinking he was called off by the shortstop.
I still think this is nothing in OBR, but it would be a judgement call as it did CONFUSE the Defensive player. The sames as F6 telling a just stealing runner a ball was foul when it wasn't.
__________________
3apps "It isn't enough for an umpire merely to know what he's doing. He has to look as though he know what he's doing too." - National League Umpire Larry Goetz "Boys, I'm one of those umpires that misses 'em every once in a while so if it's close, you'd better hit it." |
|
|||
Quote:
Last edited by UMP25; Thu May 31, 2007 at 01:48pm. |
|
|||
(forget this term of "verbal interference"--I wouldn't even use that adjective "verbal" in my explanation to the inevitably arguing coach or manager)?
It is true that the strict meaning of verbal is simply "of, in, or by means of words." Therefore, a written letter or a stone-carved saying is a verbal communication, and editors of documents that could have legal consequences are careful to distinguish between verbal and oral. In general usage, though, verbal has come to mean oral, as in, "He gave me verbal assurance." So if we had to go to court to argue "verbal interference," then "Drop it!" might qualify, but "Blagghhh!" might not, since it's not a word. Of course, we'd have an argument if a passing runner yelled "Irregardless!" and the startled fielder dropped the ball. But let's not ensconce "oral interference" in the rule book. If there was a snake under 3b, how would F5 know it? That's enough out of you!
__________________
greymule More whiskey—and fresh horses for my men! Roll Tide! |
|
|||
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
... ![]() |
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
GB |
|
|||
Not calling it both ways?
Many of these "bush league" events are still legal today. I won't discuss rare tactics such as the defensive decoys employed by the Miami H-Canes' to win a CWS. I believe MLB fielder's are also allowed to block the runner's vision of a caught fly ball. A-Rod had an opportunity for 225 million pay "$$-backs" and the defense complains because it worked. My only question after this broo-ha-ha is whether the rules will be changed to prevent the runner from yelling "mine" in the future?
Last edited by SAump; Fri Jun 01, 2007 at 01:10am. |
|
|||
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/01/sp...tml?ref=sports
Link to an article this morning about the A-Rod incident.
__________________
greymule More whiskey—and fresh horses for my men! Roll Tide! |
|
|||
Quote:
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
F2: Verbal 'interference'? | Bluefoot | Softball | 19 | Thu Jul 27, 2006 02:38pm |
Do you ever call Verbal Interference? | DaveASA/FED | Softball | 10 | Tue May 24, 2005 04:48pm |
Verbal Interference 2 | Joe Kupka | Softball | 23 | Mon Dec 01, 2003 01:23pm |
verbal interference ??? | ump11 | Baseball | 21 | Mon Jun 02, 2003 06:24pm |
verbal interference | arkblue | Softball | 6 | Fri May 09, 2003 04:15pm |