The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Wed May 23, 2007, 12:54pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 119
Interference Questions

Which, if any, of these situations are considered interference?


1. R2, pitch rolls away from the catcher, BR steps out of the box to watch his runner and inadvertantly kicks the ball. R2 reaches 3rd base safely.

2. Popup on the first base line. F3 slides over to foul territory to catch the ball. BR veers to the fair side of him in order to avoid contact, F3 has misjudged the ball and now comes back into fair territory and there is a collision. Ball drops.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Wed May 23, 2007, 01:04pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,057
Send a message via Yahoo to UmpJM
Cool

cshs81,

The second one (only). 7.09(i)

JM
__________________
Finally, be courteous, impartial and firm, and so compel respect from all.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Wed May 23, 2007, 01:09pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 119
Quote:
Originally Posted by CoachJM
cshs81,

The second one (only). 7.09(i)

JM
I'm guessing the "inadvertantly" part is the key factor????

What if the catcher picked up the ball that got away and could not throw to 3rd because the batter was backing up ? Lets assume we deem that he was not intentionally getting in the way of the catcher.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Wed May 23, 2007, 01:31pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,577
Quote:
Originally Posted by cshs81
What if the catcher picked up the ball that got away and could not throw to 3rd because the batter was backing up ? Lets assume we deem that he was not intentionally getting in the way of the catcher.
No intent, no INT. Once the defense has misplayed the pitch, the bar for INT goes higher.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 24, 2007, 02:00am
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Lakeside, California
Posts: 6,724
Quote:
Originally Posted by LMan
No intent, no INT. Once the defense has misplayed the pitch, the bar for INT goes higher.
You are right.
__________________
Matthew 15:14, 1 Corinthians 1:23-25
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 24, 2007, 11:06am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 1,606
Quote:
Originally Posted by SanDiegoSteve
You are right.
Except that "no intent, no interference" is not correct. One need not have intent to have interference.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Wed May 23, 2007, 02:22pm
In Time Out
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,263
Quote:
Originally Posted by cshs81

What if the catcher picked up the ball that got away and could not throw to 3rd because the batter was backing up ? Lets assume we deem that he was not intentionally getting in the way of the catcher.
If the batter got hit by a actual throw or impeded with the catchers attempt to throw, you would have interference in this case. By attempt, I mean there was contact between the two. Batter should remain in his box during this play. Do not judge intent.
__________________
I have nipples, Greg. Can you milk me?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
More questions BlitzkriegBob Volleyball 1 Mon Oct 02, 2006 02:02pm
Two Questions Duke Baseball 2 Sun Jun 04, 2006 12:02pm
Runner interference versus umpire interference Jay R Baseball 1 Thu Apr 28, 2005 07:00pm
FED Questions Lapopez Baseball 3 Fri Apr 01, 2005 08:39am
Tax Questions BlitzkriegBob General / Off-Topic 4 Mon Feb 28, 2005 07:56am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:15pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1