Stance

[GarthB]

Originally Posted by mike1989

why is it that every so called top guy in your organization always critizises the way your stance is behind the plate. i have been doing this for 6 yrs now.
i have tried many and i mean many stances to find a comfort zone and also find what is comfortable to me to be able to get the best look at the zone.
alot of times my stance changes from the way alot of these catchers move.
For one, when a catcher has an 0-2 count and does the 3 feet outside the plate move....i know i aint sitting in the slot no matter what anyone says...have had 2 many pichers throw a fastball inside cause they can't control where they throw...sometimes catchers almost stand when the catch...some are short and are so low you have to move a diffrent way.
there are many fine umps that stay the same place everytime...good for them...i feel to line up over the inside edge of the catchers head to see the slot makes it more comfortable for me...yea, i do like hidind most of my body behind the catcher...i like my bones and need to be at work the next day...noone has ever really complained about my stike zone... so i move with the catcher...is this wrong ?

1. Buy good equipment and trust it.
2. Do what your assignor and trainers what you to do, or don't whine when you don't get what you want from them.

[johnSandlin]

A lot of the "top dogs" in association are seeing how the game is changing both in the style of play and the style of umpiring, and they do not want to change.

My old partner thought my mechanics and the style I use was not very good, and he use to call me out on it.

I just finally did what another poster said in an earlier comment, I ignored it and did what I was taught, watched and adapted into my own game, asked to do by supervisors, and it has worked for me.

Our association uses a rule toward newer officials, if we (veteran officials aka "top dogs") are not asked for advice, do not offer advice.

[GarthB]

Originally Posted by PWL

That would be good advice if all the people that got the better games had good field and plate mechanics. Umpire associations are more like a "secret society" than anything else. As long as they keep me in the dark, it's hard to hold much faith in anything they say.

"Do as I say, not as I do".

I've discovered that most umpires who feel their association keeps them in the dark never saw the light in the first place.

Maybe you should talk to Hensley.

Many years ago starting out, I didn't care for the advice I was getting from "top dogs" in my association. I thought I had better ways of doing things and "they work for me" attitude.

Guess what? I didn't advance very quickly. In fact, QUITE slowly!

Do not discount the advice of "top dogs" so easily.

A fine example. I worked with a guy last year who's stike mechanic is a "hammer" out in front. The problem is, he doesn't hammer it, he just sort of brings his arm up into the finish position of the hammer.

Get in front of a mirror and try just bringing your arm up to the finish position of the hammer and tell me what that looks like you are doing to the pitcher.

I tried to tell him, but he didn't want to listen. Same guy didn't like what I had to say about that curve ball that the catcher is digging out of the dirt. It isn't a strike, but on this pre-season varsity game, he was ringing it up all day and claims that this sophmores curve ball is breaking that hard.

Every level I have moved up into has required me to make adjustments to the things I do. Sometimes, it is little stuff like where I put my hands when I am relaxing between innings on the bases (in my back pockets). Sometimes, it is bigger stuff like staying in the same spot so that if the pitch is way outside, every person in the ball park can tell that the catcher is actually set up 2' outside receiving the ball!

Remember, your assignor is probably asking these "top dogs" what they think about you and probably trusts most of what they say! Again, you don't have to listen or heed their advise, but it may hold you back.

Good luck.

[SanDiegoSteve]

Originally Posted by SAump

I would hope that my loud strike call encourages the pitcher to throw more strikes by the batter. I would say that I am sending the batter a message, swing and hit the damn thing when it looks that good or prepare to go sit down, or at least that is what I hope it looks like to his coaches and teammates.

SA, rei was referring to an arm motion with the right fist, or half of a not-so-nice Italian salutation. That particular version of the "hammer" would not be such a welcome sight for the pitcher .

Originally Posted by SAump

I would hope that my loud strike call encourages the pitcher to throw more strikes by the batter. I would say that I am sending the batter a message, swing and hit the damn thing when it looks that good or prepare to go sit down, or at least that is what I hope it looks like to his coaches and teammates.

I don't think you understand. The hammer looks great when it is done right! Bring your arm up and "hammer" it.

That is not what this guy is doing. It looks like he is flipping everybody off.

[greymule]

BTW, are they no longer teaching basic writing and grammar skills in our schools ?

In most American schools today, no. Unfortunately.

[GarthB]

Originally Posted by greymule

BTW, are they no longer teaching basic writing and grammar skills in our schools ?

In most American schools today, no. Unfortunately.

They're still "teaching" it. Unfortunately, there is no longer a requirement that it be learned.

[GarthB]

Originally Posted by PWL

This reminds me of the line from Blazing Saddles. "Gentlemen, we have to protect our phony baloney jobs.

I've seen too many actions contradict too many statements. You need to come up with a better excuse than that.

Paul,

So you're saying that Hensley has a "phony baloney job?"

I thought he might be in a good position to work with you and then recommend you to the higher ups.

That would be taking positive action, which I believe, works better than whining.

[GarthB]

Originally Posted by PWL

Leroy,

You're missing the point. I don't need anybody to work with me. I just know what I see and what I hear. I'm only saying that there is only so much pie to go around and some people don't get to sit at the table it is being served at. They're not going to serve smaller portions to ensure everyone gets a piece. AFAIK, Dave isn't umpiring this year because of work commitments. He might not even have made a meeting, but I am willing to bet some one signed his name to the sign in sheet. I've seen guys sign in for three people before. You have to make so many meeting to be eligible for playoffs. Plus, there are other things I will not go into.

Let's just say things aren't as kosher as they should be.

Paul,

So you're accusing Dave of being involved in cheating, plus some other things you "will not go into."

I'm amazed. I've never known Dave to be anything less than honest, even when we disagree.

[Dave Hensley]

Originally Posted by GarthB

Paul,

So you're accusing Dave of being involved in cheating, plus some other things you "will not go into."

I'm amazed. I've never known Dave to be anything less than honest, even when we disagree.

Hey guys. I've been absent from this forum for a couple of weeks. As PWL mentioned, I didn't take a high school schedule this year due to a change in my job situation that has me traveling frequently and on short notice. I made the first few meetings of the year, but when it came time to fish or cut bait on committing to my availability to get a schedule, I cut bait.

I think PWL is referring to a perception of "good ol' boy" politics in the association he and I are members of. What I know is that the same handful of veterans have held most of the officer positions for a long time. My opinion is that that is really just a reflection of the 80/20 rule - 20% of the people in any volunteer organization end up doing 80% of the work, rather than any conscious effort on their part to exclude new blood from coming in.

Most playoff assignments are the result of coaches' requests, a practice I find somewhat peculiar but not particularly sinister. It does, though, I think make it tougher for the newer umpires to gain the necessary familiarity to get playoff assignment requests.

As for PWL's speculation that some members are skirting the meeting attendance rules without penalty, I think he's probably right. There are over 100 association members, but rarely are there more than 30-40 at any given meeting. The sign-in sheet is basically on the honor system, so he may be right that some guys are getting ghost-signed in without attending. I have never asked anyone to sign me in, nor have I ever signed in someone else.

[GarthB]

Originally Posted by Dave Hensley

I think PWL is referring to a perception of "good ol' boy" politics in the association he and I are members of. What I know is that the same handful of veterans have held most of the officer positions for a long time. My opinion is that that is really just a reflection of the 80/20 rule - 20% of the people in any volunteer organization end up doing 80% of the work, rather than any conscious effort on their part to exclude new blood from coming in.

I agree that the 80/20 rule is probably in play in more situations than any sinister motive.

Most playoff assignments are the result of coaches' requests, a practice I find somewhat peculiar but not particularly sinister. It does, though, I think make it tougher for the newer umpires to gain the necessary familiarity to get playoff assignment requests.

So if an umpire isn't getting playoff assignments, it's due to the what the coaches who he has had think about him and not exclusion by the "big dogs." Interesting.

[RPatrino]

Coach's providing feedback is important, but having them select who works the playoffs is a bit much.

What should be more important, the opinions of coach's or the respect of your peers?

[GarthB]

Originally Posted by PWL

And you're good at putting words in people's mouths. Some one could have very well have signed in for him without his knowledge. I don't know who they sign in for nor do I even care. We have a board, but never get a report. It seems they pick certain people for certain things. I find it strange the same people who run together get playoff games together.

What I alluded to was if plate and field mechanics were a specific requirement, some people who work higher level games shouldn't be working them. I've seem some who are past their prime, if they ever had one to begin with.

Now, I think we have some very knowledgeable and competent officials. They just don't make themselves accessible. Like Dave said about fishing and cutting bait. They put themselves in the position that they should cut bait.

Way to hijack a thread..........

Hey, pal....you're the one to mention Dave's name in the same context of people cheating and things you couldn't mention. I asked if you accusing Dave. You could have just answered the question.

No one's hijacked anything. We've moved along to the policy Dave mentioned of your coaches selecting post season umps. Keep up.

In my area, playoff coaches can name three umps they would like to see on the dish or their home games, and three they want to scratch from any of their home games. The commissioner tries to accomodate the plate job requests (but, it is often the same few guys that EVERYBODY wants anyway!) and always honors the scratch list! I don't really have a problem with this, nor do most the umpires in my association I have talked to about it. You don't have to make anybodies "preferred" list to do playoffs, and you could still do an away game for a team who has scratched you! (don't get any funny ideas! Nobody ever knows if they have been scratched, and it should be that way!)