The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jun 23, 2006, 08:45am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 164
Quote:
Originally Posted by LMan
How do you reconcile (on that chart):

"Maintains the same strike zone throughout the game"

and

"Has a grasp of how the zone may be adjusted in a lopsided game"?

..in the same evaluation paragraph?




Well, if the game is not lopsided, and you maintain the same strike zone throughout the game, you have done well.

If the game is lopsided, and you adjusted your zone in a way that kept things moving along, you have done well.

Is this such a hard concept to understand? I don't get what part of that you don't understand. It seemed VERY obvious to me the first time I read it.

I don't know of ANY higher level (at least college level) umpires who DON'T adjust their zone to be a bit bigger in lopsided games. It is a perfectly acceptable practice, and is obviously endorsed by the NCAA.

I would be a fool to call a "rule book" strike zone in a game that is 20-3. I am expanding that zone to get out of their a bit quicker. Nobody is complaining!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jun 23, 2006, 10:45am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,577
I understand the concept perfectly well, I was more or less poking at the apparent contradiction on the form, two paragraphs apart. I take my humor where I can get it

Just shows again that you cannot effectively manage a game by going strictly by the rules and nothing but. There is accepted usage, tradition, etc to consider as well if you want to be more than a barely-adequate umpire.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jun 23, 2006, 12:18pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Washington
Posts: 1,491
Send a message via AIM to RPatrino Send a message via Yahoo to RPatrino
PDX, I'll continue to use the GD. Most of the umpires I work with are now converting to it as well. That is not a coincidence that is irrelevant. I work with NCAA umpires, by the way, who are also seeing an increasing number of GD converts.

I use results to measure success or failure, and my personal results tell me that the GD has made a great improvement in my game.
__________________
Bob P.

-----------------------
We are stewards of baseball. Our customers aren't schools or coaches or conferences. Our customer is the game itself.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jun 23, 2006, 03:48pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 164
Quote:
Originally Posted by LMan
I understand the concept perfectly well, I was more or less poking at the apparent contradiction on the form, two paragraphs apart.
Maybe I am missing something, but there does not seem to be any contradiction. They want you to call a consistent zone innings 1-9. IF the game becomes lopsided, they want you to be able to "adjust" your zone.

Just because "consistent zone innings 1-9" comes first does not mean that is cast in stone.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
another view LMan Baseball 47 Fri Oct 28, 2005 03:17pm
Your view please debeau Softball 20 Tue Mar 22, 2005 10:17am
How most people view us :-p brandan89 Basketball 6 Mon Jan 03, 2005 03:08am
The View from the Other Side rainmaker Basketball 9 Wed Dec 01, 2004 01:33pm
the view from the bench mrsref Basketball 15 Thu Jan 20, 2000 03:56pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:35pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1