The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 5 votes, 1.80 average. Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jun 20, 2006, 06:23am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 760
This is funny...once again Rut proves his worth to the board.

I believe his response to posts like this is, "Hey get a life and learn that we don't all not have to read what we don't want to. Just because you don't want to talk about it any more doesn't mean that we don't. If you don't like the topic ignore it or do you have to show eveyone that you don't have a backbone? You don't like it, that's too bad. This is a discussion board and we can talk about whatever we want to talk about. Peace"

(grin)
__________________
"You can tell whether a man is clever by his answers.
You can tell whether a man is wise by his questions.
~Naguib Mahfouz
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jun 20, 2006, 09:36am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 170
Nobody is suppressing your free speech

At least, not Rut or me. The moderators are another story- their board, their rules.

But then, WWTB, I bet if I did an extensive search of your posts, you would never have encouraged somebody to move on, make a point or shut up or anything similar. I won't go there. You get the point.

Rut has every bit as much right to speak and complain of the endless prattling about how the AMLU sucks and you and your fellow replacements were better in every aspect of umpiring as you have to prattle.

"Half the world is composed of people who have something to say and can't, and the other half who have nothing to say and keep on saying it."- Robert Frost

Strikes and outs!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jun 20, 2006, 10:06am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 202
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueLawyer
Rut has every bit as much right to speak and complain of the endless prattling about how the AMLU sucks and you and your fellow replacements were better in every aspect of umpiring as you have to prattle.
As I read it, Rut was the one trying to dissuade posts on this subject not WWTB. I thought WWTB was simply pointing out Ruts' change of heart on when threads shoud end.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jun 20, 2006, 10:22am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 108
Cool

Blo40 Said This And I Even Agree With Him.....go Figure.

*sigh*.....yawn
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jun 20, 2006, 10:24am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 164
BlueLawyer, you probably suck arguing cases in court! YOUR obvious disdain for people that disagree with your ignorant point of view is on full display when you make untrue comments such as:

"and you and your fellow replacements were better in every aspect of umpiring "

You will NEVER be able to back that statement with anything resembling facts!

As jury leader, I am recommending to the judge to throw your stupid self in jail!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jun 20, 2006, 10:51am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 505
Exclamation SCabUMP and I agree???

I never thought I'd see the day...
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jun 20, 2006, 11:03am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: South Bend, In.
Posts: 2,192
Send a message via AIM to BigUmp56 Send a message via Yahoo to BigUmp56
Quote:
Originally Posted by pdxblue
BlueLawyer, you probably suck arguing cases in court! YOUR obvious disdain for people that disagree with your ignorant point of view is on full display when you make untrue comments such as:

"and you and your fellow replacements were better in every aspect of umpiring "

You will NEVER be able to back that statement with anything resembling facts!

As jury leader, I am recommending to the judge to throw your stupid self in jail!
The merits of the facts in his comment were not based on the performance of the replacements, rather his comment went to Windy's assertion that they were superior in every aspect. Therefore his comment was not founded on a factual basis.


Motion denied.


Tim.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Disappointed in AMLU Sal Giaco Baseball 72 Fri May 26, 2006 01:07am
A news story that has nothing to do with AMLU lawump Baseball 0 Fri May 19, 2006 07:55am
Randy Mobley talks about AMLU rejection and Young Situation MrB Baseball 15 Sat May 06, 2006 08:22pm
AMLU Scab Photo Gallery pingswinger Baseball 4 Wed May 03, 2006 12:30am
AMLU rejects proposal your boss Baseball 40 Tue May 02, 2006 09:00pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:46am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1