![]() |
|
|
|||
Hmmm,
I have followed the emerging mechanic of MLB guys . . .
When a pitch is very close AND important I give the description of where I called the miss. Remember, for decades, we were trained to give "subtle" signals for ALL calls of "BALL." To me, giving the description immediately stops: "where was that BLUE?" To each their own . . . Regards, |
|
|||
I agree whole heartedly with T. I have heard many of the big league umps announcing the location of a ball. I have been doing it for several years now without a problem. I joined a new association a couple of years ago (I have been umpiring 26 years) and went to one of their training sessions. When going to the pitching machine station, the instructor stated emphatically that you should never give the location of a pitch when calling it a ball. When one of the other newbies asked if he should answer a coach if the coach asked him where the pitch was, the instructor told him sure, as long as it's done politely and not on every pitch. When I then asked why not say it on the pitch and avoid the question, I was not given any logical explanation. In my experience, it has greatly reduced the amount of conversation that takes place between me, the pitcher, the catcher, and the coach. Those that choose to argue after I make the call were going to argue anyway.
Chris Wright |
|
|||
What's good for the goose
What happens at the MLB level is not always good for the amatuer umpire. How many of us have been to a school/camp/clinic with a big league guy who tells us, "Do X." You say, "But Mr. Crawford/Hallion/Welke, I have seen you do Y." To which he inevitably says, "I'm teaching you the RIGHT way, which is not necessarily what I do."
I think explaining a pitch is not smart at any level below MLB, and since I don't work there, I'm just going to keep saying "ball" until somebody tells me differently. Strikes and outs! |
|
|||
Last night in my previously mentioned horrific Pony game, on a pitch that was about 6 inches outside, the little rat catcher, who was pulling every bad pitch and holding it as a cockshot, did it again, and his coach asked him where the pitch was. The little rat told him "it was right there!" I said, in a voice loud enough for all to hear, "don't you lie to him, boy! You tell him where it really was! You know it was outside, that's why you pulled it a foot!"
Later in the game, this same catcher pulled a pitch that was close to a foot outside back to the middle of the plate and held it there for about 5 or 6 seconds. I told him, also loudly so his coach would hear, "if you do that one more time, you're gone, and then your team, which is ahead by 7 runs, will forfeit the game, because you will be down to 8 players. Do you understand?" He quit pulling pitches after that. Fortunately the 2:10 time limit saved me after 5 of the longest innings I can remember. BTW, I just needed to vent. Thanks for your patience. ![]()
__________________
Matthew 15:14, 1 Corinthians 1:23-25 |
|
|||
SDS, I've thanked catchers for pulling pitches back into the zone. When they ask me why I reply, "When you pull the pitch back like that it tells me that YOU think it's a ball. That makes my job easier."
It usually stops after that. |
|
|||
I've used those as well, but this guy was just pissing me off big time, and the game really sucked, and I was not a happy camper when he started lying to his coach. I am surprised the pitcher got any strikes, because the catcher pulled everything, even corners that I gave him. He thought I was some rube who was buying his little act, and I just got a bit frustrated with his antics. I think the problem was that his coach thought the pitches were where he was holding the ball, like he couldn't see him pulling them.
This is notoriously our worst league, and is pure ghetto ball all the way. Dirt infield, holes for each batter, the catcher, and the umpire, and only given two baseballs to last the whole game, by order of the league president. They are ruined after about 3 innings. More venting, I digress.
__________________
Matthew 15:14, 1 Corinthians 1:23-25 |
|
|||
I editorialize, within limits. Instead of saying "ball," I will use the following verbals:
That's low (or down). That's up. That missed. Nope. as well as the traditional "ball" for probably half the balls I call. I think my editorializing habit helps me a bit with my timing, and I know it keeps me more relaxed and comfortable behind the plate. I think catchers speak my language pretty consistently and I very rarely have a catcher or a rat peppering me with "where was that." Works for me. One final caveat - I'm talking ONLY verbals. I would never, ever, editorialize a ball with a hand motion. That looks ridiculous. |
|
|||
Quote:
![]() So we grabbed the kid and got him out of that conversation! Incidently, to keep him from spreading that gem around, we threw the old guy a surprise retirement party the next season! Bainer
__________________
"I am a firm believer in the philosophy of a ruling class...Especially since I rule!" Last edited by Bainer; Fri Jun 16, 2006 at 08:51pm. |
|
|||
If a coach asks where it was after I call BALL I ignore him, or I might give him a look over. If a catcher asks I tell him. If he say's "was that outside?" I tell him yes since he already knows. If it barely missed I probably say so, for catcher reference. I will work with a catcher.
Any border pitch that the catcher snatches back to the zone is a BALL. |
|
|||
i only call 'ball' or 'strike'. if a pitcher misses inside a few times, or is hitting just below the knee, ill tell the catcher "thats a bit down" or "bring it in a bit" but i dont say it for the whole world to hear.
|
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Mechanic - Help from Plate on Foot Pull | BayouUmp | Baseball | 73 | Wed Mar 09, 2005 08:42am |
Plate Mechanic on 3rd Strike Foul Ball for Out | varefump | Softball | 4 | Mon Feb 14, 2005 11:17am |
Coed slopitch and the plate line vs home plate | SactoBlue | Softball | 14 | Thu Oct 28, 2004 11:42am |
How is your mechanic... | thumpferee | Baseball | 17 | Fri May 21, 2004 12:07pm |