![]() |
|
|
|||
Quote:
Not bashing that form of umpiring, although I don't agree with it. TECHNICALLY, he's safe, based off the definition of the tag I outlined above |
|
|||
Quote:
Doug |
|
|||
Call the out.
It's like not calling a pitch that passes through the strike zone, but gets past the catcher and ends up at the backstop a strike. Everybody thinks its a ball, so we call it a ball. Same thing here. Everybody thinks its an out, so call it an out. You will see this type of tag many more times in your career.
__________________
Have Great Games ! Nick |
|
|||
Quote:
Oh thanks, nick, you just summoned the 'spirit of NIUmp50' to come and dispute you ![]() ![]() |
|
|||
Quote:
Sorry Nick, I know this puts you in a terrible spot. RE: the strike issue he said it the way it is, I'm in total agreement as to why such 'strikes' are called 'balls' I simply disagree with the reasoning. Re: the legal tag I'm in total agreement with nick I stated very early in this thread, knowing it was not a textbook tag, that as long as there was no separation between ball and glove I had an out because I knew I could sell it and it was expected. I admit, I'm a ho' I'll take the strike or out when it is expected and I'll take the strike or out when it's textbook. |
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
Have Great Games ! Nick |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Legal Tag? | bwbuddy | Softball | 7 | Wed Jun 14, 2006 02:44am |
Legal Bat ? | SCREF | Football | 6 | Thu Jul 22, 2004 06:44am |
Legal CR? | whiskers_ump | Softball | 17 | Sun Jul 11, 2004 04:48am |
legal tag? | ind224 | Baseball | 12 | Wed Nov 12, 2003 04:37pm |
Legal? | Just Curious | Softball | 1 | Sun Apr 01, 2001 08:36pm |