The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #166 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jun 13, 2006, 10:52am
Rich's Avatar
Get away from me, Steve.
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 15,785
Quote:
Originally Posted by ctblu40
The key to calling ball and strikes is consistancy.
I have developed what I call "the strike zone of least resistance". The pitch must be at or below about 2" above the belt. Nothing below the hollow beneath the knee. A little bit in is OK, I'll grab it for a strike. 2-3" out and I can get it.

Now it's story time- I was working a summer adult wood bat league game last week. In the 3rd or 4th, a pitch comes in for a high strike, and I call it a strike (I should've balled it). The batter looks at me and says, "That was a ball my last at bat." I said "It was a strike that time." He shakes his head digs in and we go. Next pitch was in the same spot... "Ball" He (the batter) looked at me and I said "See, it's a ball again."
In the parking lot after the game the batter approached me and said, "I guess everyone misses them once in a while?" I said, "I didn't miss it, I'm schitzophrenic." We had a good laugh
Hardly anyone complains on the high strike anymore. We've been calling it for a few years and just about anything below the letters is an easy one to grab. This started in the NCAA and MLB and has trickled down.

Why restrict yourself to 2" above the belt?
Reply With Quote
  #167 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jun 13, 2006, 10:53am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 505
Because if I called the high strike all the time, I'd be the only umpire in my association and probably the state calling it.
Reply With Quote
  #168 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jun 13, 2006, 11:10am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 7,620
I don't really have anything to add. I'd just like to see this thread get to 20 pages. Thanks for reading!
__________________
Cheers,
mb
Reply With Quote
  #169 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jun 13, 2006, 11:14am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: South Bend, In.
Posts: 2,192
Send a message via AIM to BigUmp56 Send a message via Yahoo to BigUmp56
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich Fronheiser
Hardly anyone complains on the high strike anymore. We've been calling it for a few years and just about anything below the letters is an easy one to grab. This started in the NCAA and MLB and has trickled down.

Why restrict yourself to 2" above the belt?
Rich:

Let me ask you a question. I know you work juniors and seniors in the Summer and college and HS in the Spring. How age dependant is the height of your strike zone, if it is at all? I find myself holding the older players to a higher standard to keep the ball down then I do the younger players.


Tim.
Reply With Quote
  #170 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jun 13, 2006, 11:35am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 477
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich Fronheiser
Hardly anyone complains on the high strike anymore. We've been calling it for a few years and just about anything below the letters is an easy one to grab. This started in the NCAA and MLB and has trickled down.

Why restrict yourself to 2" above the belt?
My upper zone was about 1 fist above the belt (about 3"-4") for many years. The move to the higher strike zone has enabled me to about double that (just below the letters)...... I like it!

"Strike" is my second favorite word in baseball.
Reply With Quote
  #171 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jun 13, 2006, 11:51am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,729
Hmmmm,

I am rather surprised that the "high Strike" is even mentioned.

I work a pretty high quality of baseball and we are expected to call anything below the letters a strike (see 'justme' above) and there is never a peep about it.

Since I do not work "non-shaving aged players" I would guess that that strike zone could even be bigger.

The days (even in the hotbed of baseball, Connecticut) of ending the high strike at 2" above the belt is a thing of the past. Every upper level evaluator looks for the "high strike" as a given in this modern age.

Regards,
Reply With Quote
  #172 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jun 13, 2006, 03:10pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 202
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tim C
I am rather surprised that the "high Strike" is even mentioned.

I work a pretty high quality of baseball and we are expected to call anything below the letters a strike (see 'justme' above) and there is never a peep about it.

Since I do not work "non-shaving aged players" I would guess that that strike zone could even be bigger.
Generally speaking anything at or above the letters is out of the textbook strikezone, not only that but it is also generally above the elbows and close to the hands. If you call the proper zone the advantage is already with the pitcher, calling a strike at or above the letters puts the batter at a severe disadvantage. Non shaving kids have less strength and quickness than shaving kids so it would put them at an even larger disadvantage.
I would not advocate raising the strike zone for the kids.
Reply With Quote
  #173 (permalink)  
Old Sat Jun 12, 2010, 08:38pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 105
Quote:
Originally Posted by TussAgee11 View Post
"The Strike Zone is that area over home plate the upper limit of which is a horizontal line at the midpoint between the top of the shoulders and the top of the uniform pants, and the lower level is a line at the top of the knees. The Strike Zone shall be determined from the batter's stance as the batter is prepared to swing at a pitched ball."
So is the top of the strike zone determined by the batter's stance that he takes waiting for the pitch, or when he begins his motion to swing? I think his height drops down a little as he goes into motion. What about when he squares to bunt?

I think the strike zone is a five-sided prism suspended above the white part of the plate (not the black edges). The top and bottom planes determined by the batter's stance. If the top of the ball is between the upper and lower plane, and any part of the ball is within ths sides of the prism, then it's a strike.

It doesn't matter if the batter stands forward or backwards in his box, the zone is over the plate.
Reply With Quote
  #174 (permalink)  
Old Sat Jun 12, 2010, 11:53pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Randolph, NJ
Posts: 1,936
Send a message via Yahoo to waltjp
Four years later?
__________________
I got a fever! And the only prescription.. is more cowbell!
Reply With Quote
  #175 (permalink)  
Old Sat Jun 12, 2010, 11:59pm
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,523
Quote:
Originally Posted by waltjp View Post
Four years later?
I was trying to figure out who this Rich Fronheiser person was?

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
  #176 (permalink)  
Old Sun Jun 13, 2010, 01:31am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,057
Send a message via Yahoo to UmpJM
Cool

bsaucer,

First, I would like to commend your archeological expertise.

Second, I believe you have given a reasonably accurate description of three dimensions of the strike zone. I could quibble on a couple of points, but I don't really see that well, so it probably doesn't matter.

Third, The strike zone is actually four dimensional. The fourth dimension is time. That's why "timing" is so important.

In regard to your question, I honestly don't know the correct answer. Curious.

JM
__________________
Finally, be courteous, impartial and firm, and so compel respect from all.
Reply With Quote
  #177 (permalink)  
Old Sun Jun 13, 2010, 05:56am
Rich's Avatar
Get away from me, Steve.
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 15,785
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRutledge View Post
I was trying to figure out who this Rich Fronheiser person was?

Peace
Some jerk, no doubt.
Reply With Quote
  #178 (permalink)  
Old Sun Jun 13, 2010, 07:28am
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hell
Posts: 20,211
Quote:
Originally Posted by RichMSN View Post
Some jerk, no doubt.
Maybe we should have a poll.
Reply With Quote
  #179 (permalink)  
Old Sun Jun 13, 2010, 07:45am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 7,620
Quote:
Originally Posted by bsaucer View Post
So is the top of the strike zone determined by the batter's stance that he takes waiting for the pitch, or when he begins his motion to swing?
Yes. Same thing.
__________________
Cheers,
mb
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Strike Zone Stripes1950 Baseball 27 Tue Apr 26, 2005 11:20pm
Strike Zone rwest Softball 20 Tue Oct 07, 2003 06:47am
strike zone archer Softball 22 Tue Sep 23, 2003 04:39pm
MLB strike Zone mick Baseball 3 Fri May 30, 2003 07:59pm
The New Strike Zone Ump20 Baseball 1 Mon Mar 19, 2001 10:17pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:25pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1