The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Fri Mar 24, 2006, 01:46pm
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Lakeside, California
Posts: 6,724
Quote:
Originally Posted by Durham
The way I learned it, pro ball and NAPBL blue book, it is referred to as Backswing interference. The batter is only out if it is the third strike, but not otherwise. No runners may advance, but it is a delayed dead ball and the catcher can still have the opportunity to retire the runner. And NCAA 6-2-d refers to it as well.

I am glad we would rule it the same we just call it something different.
Durham,

I'm sure you are right that you call it Backswing Interference, since you are the one who is working the level you do.

This is what my copy of the NAPBL says:

If a batter strikes at a ball and misses and swings so hard that he carries the bat all the way around and, in the umpire's judgment, unintentionally hits the catcher or the ball in back of him on the backswing (i.e., the follow-through), it shall be called a strike only (no interference). The ball will be dead, however; and no runner shall advance on the play.

If this infraction should occur in a situation where the catcher's initial throw directly retires a runner despite the infraction, the play stands the same as if no violation had occurred. If this infraction should occur in a situation where the batter would normally become a runner because of a third strike not caught, the ball shall be dead and the batter declared out.

The proper mechanic is for the plate umpire to call, "Backswing hit the catcher!" as soon as the violation occurs (while pointing at the infraction), and then to call "Time" as the play dictates.

After the play is over; the umpire should then turn toward the press box and announce and signal that such infraction has occurred-the same as he should do with any unusual play-in order that the ruling be made as clear as possible.
__________________
Matthew 15:14, 1 Corinthians 1:23-25
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Fri Mar 24, 2006, 01:58pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Northern California
Posts: 396
Steve,

Mine is a few years old, but it has a heading that is bold and says, Backswing Interference, but the text is the same as yours. Its kind of like we call it catcher's interference, when it really is obstruction, its just words. As long as we enforce it all the same then we keep the baseball gods happy.

Last edited by Durham; Fri Mar 24, 2006 at 02:12pm.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Fri Mar 24, 2006, 02:03pm
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Lakeside, California
Posts: 6,724
Your right, I was just picking nits anyway.
__________________
Matthew 15:14, 1 Corinthians 1:23-25
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
recent soccer posts refnrev Feedback 0 Wed Jul 06, 2005 11:39pm
Games whiskers_ump Softball 16 Tue Feb 22, 2005 11:05pm
10/1/04 games SouthGARef Football 9 Sun Oct 03, 2004 09:01am
Not Enough Games Cyber-Ref Basketball 28 Fri Dec 19, 2003 06:59am
Games Flu away mick Basketball 1 Thu Dec 18, 2003 10:17am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:21pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1