|
|||
Re: Re: NLump50 Nailed It !
Quote:
I schedule our JV and Jr. High games and they get two 90 minute games and get paid $65. So they are home in 3 hours with $65. I get to work the varsity game and all I get paid is $50. (could be two hours but could be four hours) As far as time and money, its more lucrative to work the lower level games. thanks David |
|
|||
Re: Re: Re: NLump50 Nailed It !
Quote:
Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble." ----------------------------------------------------------- Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010) |
|
|||
Originally posted by Rich Fronheiser
I think you're wrong. I think JV officials should be paid in such a manner that encourages them to become good enough to work varsity games. In other words, if you're getting $58 for varsity, I'd pay about $35 for JV, both single and 2-man. I'd charge the schools more as an association, but that money wouldn't go to the umpire -- it would go into the association. The goal should be to get schools to hire 2 officials, not make it attractive for the officials to go out and work 1-man. Rich in theory I agree with you but not in reality. Ultimately it depends upon where you live and the size of the school budgets. If you start "Low-balling" JV umpires you will lose them to other Youth Organizations who pay for umpires. Using your example; why should I take a $35.00 FEE, give up vacation days at work (School games start at around the 4-4:30 range) when I can work a Babe-Ruth game after work, not loose any vacation/personal days for the same amount. Also, at least from my experience school ball is more about politics than who is really qualified. In Summary I agree with your philosophy but depending upon where you live it will not work. Here's how the assignments are in my area: Varsity - 2 person crews all the time JV, Feshman, Modified - Fill in as needed. In other words if possible assign 2 person crews but the reality is there simply isn't enough umpires to go around so the association has to make it "somewhat attractive" to umpire the lower levels. Cutting the FEES or asking the Schools to "foot the bill" is NOT the answer. School Budgets are "Locked in" for the most part. If the school budgets do need to be cut athletics is one of the first places they go unless it's profitable like say Texas HS Football. Pete Booth [Edited by PeteBooth on Mar 7th, 2006 at 10:40 AM]
__________________
Peter M. Booth |
|
|||
Re: Re: Re: Re: NLump50 Nailed It !
Quote:
The way I've looked at it, if they younger guys are getting paid well, they might want to stick around. I don't know about other areas, but we have a severe shortage of HS umpires. We have six schools that play 9th grade and Jr High ball, that's 12 umpires every Monday and Thursday. The young guys are guaranteed work, all of the games are DH so they get to work plate and bases, and best of all, most of the HS varsity coaches are watching the games - they know a good umpire when they see one and that might count when they finally get a shot at varsity games. thanks David |
|
|||
I believe that if an ump does a game by his/herself they should be paid the pay of two umps. Schools submit a bugget every year and within that budget the pay for two umps is included. I also feel that jv or varisty should be paid the same, the game is has the same amout of innings the same amount of players the same field etc... I also feel that if the schools paid for two umps when only one is avaiable they will try harder to get two umps to the game. I worked some game where I felt I should have been paid for a four man crew lol.
|
|
||||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Now that's funny!
Quote:
Thanks David |
Bookmarks |
|
|