don't do it. stay with the box and learn it. UNLESS there is a guy who can teach you the GD stance.

Yes - I use the GD.

could someone please explain why it would be hard to adapt the box into the GD method. I'm sure there is something I'm missing, but the GD looks like the box, just a little higher and a few steps back.

Joe

Hehehe
 

" . . . could someone please explain why it would be hard to adapt the box into the GD method. I'm sure there is something I'm missing, but the GD looks like the box, just a little higher and a few steps back."

`SIGH`

And therein lies the problem.

I'm sorry, I was being serious. I don't mean to be ignorant but it seems very adaptable from the box, especially for a newbie that doesn't have old habits to break

Joe

Everyone seems to be forgetting that the thing about using the GD System is that it is not about where you put your feet, or how it relates to the box or heel-toe.

I evolved into a user of the GD system because of my frustration with inconsistency and my desire to improve. Comparing the GD to other stances and positions is like comparing a Pinto with a Porsche. Yes, they both have 4 rubber tires, but thats where the similarity ends.

My criticism of most other stances, including the one taught by Jim Evans, is that is does not have a consistent lock-in mechanism, you tend to work much too low and much too close to the catcher.

If you are worried about injuring your neck or arm or hands, don't use the system. If you are worried about looking like everyone else, or that your evaluators will lower your grades because you use the GD, then don't use it. Its a matter of personal preference.

However, don't be disappointed when you lose the plumb plate assignment in a playoff game to someone who uses the GD. It's just that good!!!