The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #16 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 07, 2005, 12:45pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 555
I used to play a lot of racquetball. When one player was about to hit the ball and the other inadvertently got right in their way, you could hold up, not hit the ball, and call hinder. It was the gentlemanly thing to do and the point was replayed.

In baseball however there are no hinders. If I was a coach, I would simply tell my players to throw the ball. It is the base runner's responsibility to get the heck out of the way. If for some reason the pivot man could see that his throw was going to nail someone and they had time to think about it and double clutch, I would encourage them to do that as I'm sure interference would likely be called.

But first and foremost they should just complete the throw and tried for the double play. I think that maybe what Steve had been trying to say.
__________________
Well I am certainly wiser than this man. It is only too likely that neither of us has any knowledge to boast of; but he thinks that he knows something which he does not know, whereas I am quite conscious of my ignorance. At any rate it seems that I am wiser than he is to this small extent, that I do not think that I know what I do not know. ~Socrates
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 07, 2005, 01:41pm
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Lakeside, California
Posts: 6,724
Quote:
Originally posted by Kaliix
I used to play a lot of racquetball. When one player was about to hit the ball and the other inadvertently got right in their way, you could hold up, not hit the ball, and call hinder. It was the gentlemanly thing to do and the point was replayed.

In baseball however there are no hinders. If I was a coach, I would simply tell my players to throw the ball. It is the base runner's responsibility to get the heck out of the way. If for some reason the pivot man could see that his throw was going to nail someone and they had time to think about it and double clutch, I would encourage them to do that as I'm sure interference would likely be called.

But first and foremost they should just complete the throw and tried for the double play. I think that maybe what Steve had been trying to say.
Thank you. Yes, that's what I was trying to say exactly. If a baserunner is in the way of a direct throw to first base, he is liable to get beaned. That's what I meant. The coach should tell the fielder to go ahead and throw the ball.

I understand all the legal liabilities these days. Everything is litigation. Sorry for offending your PC sensibilities folks, but I learned how to play baseball before they had a "slide or avoid rule." We played rough and tumble baseball back in the day, and after that, we were old enough to join Little League. We entered the game knowing the fundamentals, which is very different today. Our coaches would have had no problem with what I said.

__________________
Matthew 15:14, 1 Corinthians 1:23-25
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 07, 2005, 01:47pm
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Lakeside, California
Posts: 6,724
Quote:
Originally posted by mbyron
Quote:
Originally posted by SanDiegoSteve
The coaches need to teach those middle infielders at a young age that if the runner doesn't slide or run out of the baseline to avoid interfering with the throw, to chuck it right at their melon.
To quote a sage, this ties for the dumbest post on the internet. Who's going to pay those coaches' legal bills - you?
I've seen some of your articles, so I guess they are what my post is tied with.
__________________
Matthew 15:14, 1 Corinthians 1:23-25
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 07, 2005, 01:53pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 4,222
[QUOTE]Originally posted by SanDiegoSteve
Quote:
[

The coach should tell the fielder to go ahead and throw the ball.
That's a much different statement than: "chuck it right at their melon."
__________________
GB
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 07, 2005, 02:09pm
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Lakeside, California
Posts: 6,724
[QUOTE]Originally posted by GarthB
Quote:
Originally posted by SanDiegoSteve
Quote:
[

The coach should tell the fielder to go ahead and throw the ball.
That's a much different statement than: "chuck it right at their melon."
Yes, in hindsight, that was a bit over the top.
__________________
Matthew 15:14, 1 Corinthians 1:23-25
Reply With Quote
  #21 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 07, 2005, 03:48pm
JJ JJ is offline
Veteran College Umpire
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: IN
Posts: 1,122
I liken this play to a batter's interference on a steal - just because he's there (the batter in front of the plate or the runner standing in the base path) doesn't mean he interfered. That's why I get the big money - to decide if he interfered.

JJ
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old Thu Dec 08, 2005, 01:13am
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Lakeside, California
Posts: 6,724
Quote:
Originally posted by thomaswhite
Quote:
Originally posted by SanDiegoSteve
The coaches need to teach those middle infielders at a young age that if the runner doesn't slide or run out of the baseline to avoid interfering with the throw, to chuck it right at their melon. They will soon learn to "slide or avoid" whenever they are forced and a play is made on them.

This is how we learned the game, so what is the sense in babying the youth of today? Ever see a big leaguer come in standing up when the fielder is at the bag turning the routine DP?
It was stupid advice then, it is stupid advice today, it will be stupid advice tomorrow.

What you teach is to turn the DP and get the out and if the R gets hit, then you hope you get an interference call to bail out your stupid throw.
Hey Tom,

Come in standing up when I'm turning the DP and see what I do then. I know I'll get the interference call, and the throw will not have been stupid, but you will have been.
__________________
Matthew 15:14, 1 Corinthians 1:23-25
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old Thu Dec 08, 2005, 08:45am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 555
After saying that Steves advice was stupid (3 times) and inferring that he was as well, you should likely take your own advice.

Pejorative words like "stupid" are not a sign of maturity...


Quote:
Originally posted by thomaswhite
Quote:
Originally posted by SanDiegoSteve
Quote:
Originally posted by thomaswhite
Quote:
Originally posted by SanDiegoSteve
The coaches need to teach those middle infielders at a young age that if the runner doesn't slide or run out of the baseline to avoid interfering with the throw, to chuck it right at their melon. They will soon learn to "slide or avoid" whenever they are forced and a play is made on them.

This is how we learned the game, so what is the sense in babying the youth of today? Ever see a big leaguer come in standing up when the fielder is at the bag turning the routine DP?
It was stupid advice then, it is stupid advice today, it will be stupid advice tomorrow.

What you teach is to turn the DP and get the out and if the R gets hit, then you hope you get an interference call to bail out your stupid throw.
Hey Tom,

Come in standing up when I'm turning the DP and see what I do then. I know I'll get the interference call, and the throw will not have been stupid, but you will have been.
Grow up.
__________________
Well I am certainly wiser than this man. It is only too likely that neither of us has any knowledge to boast of; but he thinks that he knows something which he does not know, whereas I am quite conscious of my ignorance. At any rate it seems that I am wiser than he is to this small extent, that I do not think that I know what I do not know. ~Socrates
Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old Thu Dec 08, 2005, 01:27pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Germantown, TN (east of Memphis)
Posts: 783
USSSA uses OBR. They have a "no collision rule" but the situation described does not come under that category since there was no collision.

There is no equivalent of the FED FPSR.

The middle infielder should have thrown the ball just like the big leaguers do. Had he done that, a valuable lesson would have been learned.

Either ...

R1 would learn how much it hurts when hit with a baseball, or

The middle infielder would find out what happens when you try to throw *around* a runner who is in the way ... a WILD THROW!

David Emerling
Memphis, TN
Reply With Quote
  #25 (permalink)  
Old Thu Dec 08, 2005, 02:39pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 555
What...????????

Quote:
Originally posted by thomaswhite
A: Maybe because some people are too annoyed by top-posting.
Q: Why do I not get an answer to my question(s)?
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
__________________
Well I am certainly wiser than this man. It is only too likely that neither of us has any knowledge to boast of; but he thinks that he knows something which he does not know, whereas I am quite conscious of my ignorance. At any rate it seems that I am wiser than he is to this small extent, that I do not think that I know what I do not know. ~Socrates
Reply With Quote
  #26 (permalink)  
Old Thu Dec 08, 2005, 02:46pm
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hell
Posts: 20,211
Quote:
Originally posted by Kaliix
[B]What...????????

Quote:
Originally posted by thomaswhite
A: Maybe because some people are too annoyed by top-posting.
Q: Why do I not get an answer to my question(s)?
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
He's just telling you that just about every other poster here posts after the very bottom quote sign. That lets people read the points being made in order instead of seeing the answer before the question- as per posting at the top.

Make sense now?
Reply With Quote
  #27 (permalink)  
Old Thu Dec 08, 2005, 03:04pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 555
I kinda figured that was what he was getting at. I feel just the opposite. I don't like having to read through (and scroll through) pages of stuff I just read just to see a paragraph of response. At least when you post on the top, you can read the good stuff first...

Notice he has posted twice though to my post without actually responding to it. Maybe he is a dancer in his free time...

Quote:
Originally posted by Jurassic Referee
[B]
Quote:
Originally posted by Kaliix
What...????????

Quote:
Originally posted by thomaswhite
A: Maybe because some people are too annoyed by top-posting.
Q: Why do I not get an answer to my question(s)?
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
He's just telling you that just about every other poster here posts after the very bottom quote sign. That lets people read the points being made in order instead of seeing the answer before the question- as per posting at the top.

Make sense now?
__________________
Well I am certainly wiser than this man. It is only too likely that neither of us has any knowledge to boast of; but he thinks that he knows something which he does not know, whereas I am quite conscious of my ignorance. At any rate it seems that I am wiser than he is to this small extent, that I do not think that I know what I do not know. ~Socrates
Reply With Quote
  #28 (permalink)  
Old Thu Dec 08, 2005, 03:12pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: South Bend, In.
Posts: 2,192
Send a message via AIM to BigUmp56 Send a message via Yahoo to BigUmp56

I think what he's saying is that Windy is upset by the volume of post's he's made in such a short time. There are some forums that provide a monthly top poster list each month.

For whatever reason, I think some people think topping that list gives credence to what they have to say.

Tim.

Reply With Quote
  #29 (permalink)  
Old Thu Dec 08, 2005, 04:00pm
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Lakeside, California
Posts: 6,724
Quote:
Originally posted by David Emerling
USSSA uses OBR. They have a "no collision rule" but the situation described does not come under that category since there was no collision.

There is no equivalent of the FED FPSR.

The middle infielder should have thrown the ball just like the big leaguers do. Had he done that, a valuable lesson would have been learned.

Either ...

R1 would learn how much it hurts when hit with a baseball, or

The middle infielder would find out what happens when you try to throw *around* a runner who is in the way ... a WILD THROW!

David Emerling
Memphis, TN
David,

Pretty much exactly what I said, minus the "melon" part.
__________________
Matthew 15:14, 1 Corinthians 1:23-25
Reply With Quote
  #30 (permalink)  
Old Fri Dec 09, 2005, 10:04pm
JJ JJ is offline
Veteran College Umpire
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: IN
Posts: 1,122
[/B][/QUOTE]
Where's the list? [/B][/QUOTE]

You are the only one on the list, thomaswhite.

JJ
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:53am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1