The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Wed Nov 02, 2005, 02:44pm
Rich's Avatar
Get away from me, Steve.
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 15,779
What a buffoon.


http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=2211528
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Wed Nov 02, 2005, 03:01pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: South Bend, In.
Posts: 2,192
Send a message via AIM to BigUmp56 Send a message via Yahoo to BigUmp56
Cool Idiot!!


"Roorda said his idea grew out of his frustration with umpires in the National League Championship Series."


No hidden agenda in this statement, now is there.


Tim.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Wed Nov 02, 2005, 03:17pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 3,236
Quote:
Originally posted by Rich Fronheiser
What a buffoon.


http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=2211528
If the story is correct, they already tax the players - why not the umpires?
__________________
Rich Ives
Different does not equate to wrong
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Wed Nov 02, 2005, 03:25pm
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Lakeside, California
Posts: 6,724
Consider the source. I look just behind his name. D- Missouri. The rest of the story then becomes a joke.
__________________
Matthew 15:14, 1 Corinthians 1:23-25
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Wed Nov 02, 2005, 03:56pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: South Bend, In.
Posts: 2,192
Send a message via AIM to BigUmp56 Send a message via Yahoo to BigUmp56
Quote:
Originally posted by Rich Ives
Quote:
Originally posted by Rich Fronheiser
What a buffoon.


http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=2211528
If the story is correct, they already tax the players - why not the umpires?
Rich,

I can't speak with certainty about how the players are taxed, but I would imagine their taxed in their state of primary employment.

I'm sure the umpires are paying state tax somewhere. If I had to guess, I would think it's in their state of residency.

JMO- Tim.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Wed Nov 02, 2005, 04:12pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 3,236
Depends on the state. Some of them (NY is one) have a non-resident income tax on earnings earned in NY. I'm not sure if it's for having your primary place of employment in NY or for all income earned in NY. If a NY Yankee or Mets player lives in NJ or CT, they pay NY income tax at the non-resident rate.


See

http://www.moga.state.mo.us/statutes...1430000183.HTM


for the Missouri statute.

[Edited by Rich Ives on Nov 2nd, 2005 at 04:21 PM]
__________________
Rich Ives
Different does not equate to wrong
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Wed Nov 02, 2005, 04:36pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,716
Quote:
Originally posted by SanDiegoSteve
Consider the source. I look just behind his name. D- Missouri. The rest of the story then becomes a joke.
Would R-Missouri have meant anything different. Or how about the white lawmaker from Missouri. What the heck are you trying to say?

A STUPID PERSON, GENERALLY MAKES STUPID STATEMENTS.

Don't we?
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Wed Nov 02, 2005, 06:30pm
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Lakeside, California
Posts: 6,724
Quote:
Originally posted by jicecone
Quote:
Originally posted by SanDiegoSteve
Consider the source. I look just behind his name. D- Missouri. The rest of the story then becomes a joke.
Would R-Missouri have meant anything different. Or how about the white lawmaker from Missouri. What the heck are you trying to say?

A STUPID PERSON, GENERALLY MAKES STUPID STATEMENTS.

Don't we?
Yes R-Arizona would have drawn the same response. A politician, basically. When they start trying to shove legislation down our throats, I tune them out. Arnold is doing the same thing in California, that is, trying to shove new bills down our throats.
__________________
Matthew 15:14, 1 Corinthians 1:23-25
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Wed Nov 02, 2005, 06:43pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,716
Quote:
Originally posted by SanDiegoSteve
Quote:
Originally posted by jicecone
Quote:
Originally posted by SanDiegoSteve
Consider the source. I look just behind his name. D- Missouri. The rest of the story then becomes a joke.
Would R-Missouri have meant anything different. Or how about the white lawmaker from Missouri. What the heck are you trying to say?

A STUPID PERSON, GENERALLY MAKES STUPID STATEMENTS.

Don't we?
Yes R-Arizona would have drawn the same response. A politician, basically. When they start trying to shove legislation down our throats, I tune them out. Arnold is doing the same thing in California, that is, trying to shove new bills down our throats.
Well I apologize then, because I thought you were differentiating between a Rep or Dem. But you are SOOOOO Right.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Wed Nov 02, 2005, 07:08pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,718
Just another stupid statement by a stupid, grandstanding politician. It wasn't the first time. It won't be the last.

Bob
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Wed Nov 02, 2005, 09:27pm
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Lakeside, California
Posts: 6,724
Sorry for the confusion. Some of my best friends are Democrats
__________________
Matthew 15:14, 1 Corinthians 1:23-25
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Wed Nov 02, 2005, 09:40pm
Rich's Avatar
Get away from me, Steve.
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 15,779
Quote:
Originally posted by Rich Ives
Quote:
Originally posted by Rich Fronheiser
What a buffoon.


http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=2211528
If the story is correct, they already tax the players - why not the umpires?
Why not the ticket takers in Kansas City who live in Kansas?
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Wed Nov 02, 2005, 10:32pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,729
Well Rich,

I live in a "boarder" community to Washington State.

All our craft employees that live on the Washington State side of the Columbia River are taxed, by Oregon, for every dollar they earn in this state.

I would rather review quickly this gentleman's "reason" for the tax. It appears rather obvious that he has based it as a "penalty tax" motivated by umpire performance.

As we all learned in basic polysci no tax that is established as a punishment is ever effective.

Every politician is looking for new revenue streams. Especially if those that are forced to pay them have no recourse at the ballot box.

Tee
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Wed Nov 02, 2005, 11:28pm
Rich's Avatar
Get away from me, Steve.
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 15,779
Re: Well Rich,

Quote:
Originally posted by Tim C
I live in a "boarder" community to Washington State.

All our craft employees that live on the Washington State side of the Columbia River are taxed, by Oregon, for every dollar they earn in this state.

I would rather review quickly this gentleman's "reason" for the tax. It appears rather obvious that he has based it as a "penalty tax" motivated by umpire performance.

As we all learned in basic polysci no tax that is established as a punishment is ever effective.

Every politician is looking for new revenue streams. Especially if those that are forced to pay them have no recourse at the ballot box.

Tee
See "rental car" and "hotel" taxes for GREAT examples. Try renting a car in Seattle once -- the taxes are 50% of the rate.
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old Wed Nov 02, 2005, 11:40pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 4,222
See "rental car" and "hotel" taxes for GREAT examples. Try renting a car in Seattle once -- the taxes are 50% of the rate.

That hasn't been my experience and I rent a car at Seatac at least twelve times a year. I'll check my last receipt and figure the percentage.

However, when I went to the Desert Classic last year, the combined taxes on the rental at Phoenix International increased the rental by over 65%. That included a special tax for their new football stadium and the traditional screw the tourist taxes by the state, city and county.

[Edited by GarthB on Nov 2nd, 2005 at 11:44 PM]
__________________
GB
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:45pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1