The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jun 07, 2005, 08:17am
I drank what?
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Winter Garden, FL
Posts: 1,085
Send a message via MSN to w_sohl
Question

I was watching the Cubs/Blue Jays game last night. First inning there was a dropped third strike. Ball gets tipped and Michael Barret has the ball go off of the webbing of his glove, hits him in the mask, goes down to his knee and spins for a moment and then just before it hit the ground Barret secures the ball. Initially they ruled foul ball, after Barret showed the umpire that he had secured the ball they brought some of the other umpires in to discuss and they reversed the call to a caught third strike and called the batter out. The announcers (I know, I shouldn't be listening to them) said that they thought it had to be caught cleanly. I don't doubt that the umpires got it right, if they got together and discussed it 99% of the time they are going to get it right. However is this maybe that 1%?
__________________
"Contact does not mean a foul, a foul means contact." -Me
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jun 07, 2005, 08:24am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 768
Quote:
Originally posted by w_sohl
I was watching the Cubs/Blue Jays game last night. First inning there was a dropped third strike. Ball gets tipped and Michael Barret has the ball go off of the webbing of his glove, hits him in the mask, goes down to his knee and spins for a moment and then just before it hit the ground Barret secures the ball. Initially they ruled foul ball, after Barret showed the umpire that he had secured the ball they brought some of the other umpires in to discuss and they reversed the call to a caught third strike and called the batter out. The announcers (I know, I shouldn't be listening to them) said that they thought it had to be caught cleanly. I don't doubt that the umpires got it right, if they got together and discussed it 99% of the time they are going to get it right. However is this maybe that 1%?
No, as you described it, that's a legal foul tip, because it first hit the glove, and then was caught before hitting the ground. They got it right.

Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jun 07, 2005, 08:25am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,716
Quote:
Originally posted by w_sohl
I was watching the Cubs/Blue Jays game last night. First inning there was a dropped third strike. Ball gets tipped and Michael Barret has the ball go off of the webbing of his glove, hits him in the mask, goes down to his knee and spins for a moment and then just before it hit the ground Barret secures the ball. Initially they ruled foul ball, after Barret showed the umpire that he had secured the ball they brought some of the other umpires in to discuss and they reversed the call to a caught third strike and called the batter out. The announcers (I know, I shouldn't be listening to them) said that they thought it had to be caught cleanly. I don't doubt that the umpires got it right, if they got together and discussed it 99% of the time they are going to get it right. However is this maybe that 1%?
No, it is in the 99% category.

OBR 2.00 "A FOUL TIP is a ............. It is not a catch if it is a rebound, unless the ball has first touched the catchers glove or hand."

Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jun 07, 2005, 12:50pm
I drank what?
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Winter Garden, FL
Posts: 1,085
Send a message via MSN to w_sohl
I figured they, the umpires, were right, but it just got me thinking.

The announcers did mention something about hitting the glove first, but they were not sure if that was part of the rule.
__________________
"Contact does not mean a foul, a foul means contact." -Me
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jun 07, 2005, 08:45pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 7,620
Quote:
Originally posted by w_sohl
The announcers did mention something about hitting the glove first, but they were not sure if that was part of the rule.
Well, that's announcers for ya.
__________________
Cheers,
mb
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jun 08, 2005, 07:42am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: PA
Posts: 446
Exclamation What about this sitch though...

Foul tip back to F2 in the chest protector region and instead of cleaning catching F2, for lack of a better word, "traps" the ball between the protector and the glove then comes up w/ the ball in his glove. Foul Ball?

Note: I hate to use the word "trap" here because of the normal meaning of it on a catch. But I guess that's what this would be.
__________________
I know God would never give me more than I could handle, I just wish he wouldn't trust me so much.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jun 08, 2005, 08:08am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 111
A foul tip is a batted ball that goes directly to the catcher's hands and is caught by a) any infielder in FED or b) the catcher in OBR.

It may rebound off the catcher's chest protector and be caught/trapped as a foul tip so long as it went from the bat to the catcher's hand/glove first.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jun 08, 2005, 03:13pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 813
Re: What about this sitch though...

Quote:
Originally posted by tmp44
Foul tip back to F2 in the chest protector region and instead of cleaning catching F2, for lack of a better word, "traps" the ball between the protector and the glove then comes up w/ the ball in his glove. Foul Ball?

Note: I hate to use the word "trap" here because of the normal meaning of it on a catch. But I guess that's what this would be.
In your sitch the ball did not go directly from the bat to the catcher's glove or hand---it went to his chest protector.

Ruling: Foul ball

================================================

Edit:......but just for discussion.........you are BU and see without a doubt that the ball went directly to the chest protector without first touching the glove or hand,
BUT......you PU rules this a foul tip for strike three.

Do you initiate a discussion to alert your partner of a factor of the call that he is unaware of???????


Freix



[Edited by Bfair on Jun 8th, 2005 at 04:17 PM]
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:55pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1