The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Fri Apr 22, 2005, 07:24am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Tustin, Michigan
Posts: 403
Question

Last night's FED game. Coach had 11 players. They were smearing the other team 27-1. Both players on the bench were original starters. In the top of the second inning I warned the coach about one of his players throwing the bat. The same player came up in the 3rd and threw his bat again, catching the other team's catcher across the knees. I waited till the play was over (he ended up on first) and then calmly walked down to the coach and explained that the player was restricted to the dugout for the remainder of the game.

Now the question was, who was going to take the runner's place at first? Both people on the bench were locked into other batting positions. I vaguely remember an "exceptional substitution" rule which allows another player already in the lineup to return in a different spot if an injury or disqualification takes place, and no other players are available...but I can't find it now in the rule book. Maybe I'm looking in the wrong places, or maybe I'm all wet.

I told my partner that if that rule's not in there, I'll eat my hat. Do I have some high fiber coming????
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Fri Apr 22, 2005, 07:49am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,643
The guy who batted before the guy who threw the bat can come out and run for him.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Fri Apr 22, 2005, 07:59am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Tustin, Michigan
Posts: 403
Quote:
Originally posted by LDUB
The guy who batted before the guy who threw the bat can come out and run for him.
Based on which rule?
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Fri Apr 22, 2005, 08:20am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,729
LDUB

I have never, ever heard of this being a National rule.

Please help me document this so I can yet again expand my knowledge of the FED rules I flat don't know.

If this is a rule, why does FED have the specific rule that speaks to starting with nine players but being able to play with eight?

Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Fri Apr 22, 2005, 08:22am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,129
Re: LDUB

Quote:
Originally posted by Tim C
I have never, ever heard of this being a National rule.

Please help me document this so I can yet again expand my knowledge of the FED rules I flat don't know.

If this is a rule, why does FED have the specific rule that speaks to starting with nine players but being able to play with eight?

5-4-1f, Note 1.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Fri Apr 22, 2005, 08:26am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 1,772
Re: Re: LDUB

Quote:
Originally posted by bob jenkins
Quote:
Originally posted by Tim C
I have never, ever heard of this being a National rule.

Please help me document this so I can yet again expand my knowledge of the FED rules I flat don't know.

If this is a rule, why does FED have the specific rule that speaks to starting with nine players but being able to play with eight?

5-4-1f, Note 1.
Bob, I think you meant to type

4-4-1f, note 1.

Thanks
David
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Fri Apr 22, 2005, 08:41am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,129
Re: Re: Re: LDUB

Quote:
Originally posted by David B
Quote:
Originally posted by bob jenkins
Quote:
Originally posted by Tim C
I have never, ever heard of this being a National rule.

Please help me document this so I can yet again expand my knowledge of the FED rules I flat don't know.

If this is a rule, why does FED have the specific rule that speaks to starting with nine players but being able to play with eight?

5-4-1f, Note 1.
Bob, I think you meant to type

4-4-1f, note 1.

Thanks
David
Yes -- thanks for the correction (Rule 5 starts on the same page, and I just looked at the page header when typing my response)
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Fri Apr 22, 2005, 08:48am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,729
Sooo,

What I just learned:

It is MY state that disallows this practice.

Again, I am humbled about my lack of knowledge of the ONLY rule set I use each season.

I guess I need (like Bob) to carry my books to work each day.

OR at least learn the rules!!!!!
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Fri Apr 22, 2005, 08:48am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Tustin, Michigan
Posts: 403
So,

The correct call is that the most recent "out" becomes the runner, and there is an "automatic out" each time the restricted player comes to bat in future innings...Correct?

MMMMMMMMMMM, this hat isnt so bad...pass the catsup please!
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Fri Apr 22, 2005, 08:53am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: NeverNeverLand
Posts: 1,037
Wink Tim

What do you take with your hat?
__________________
"A picture is worth a thousand words".
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Fri Apr 22, 2005, 01:55pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: CT
Posts: 2,439
I want to know how to eject or restrict a player for throwing his bat in FED. I thought that this was a local rule from some LL field!
__________________
When in doubt, bang 'em out!
Ozzy
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Fri Apr 22, 2005, 02:03pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: NeverNeverLand
Posts: 1,037
Quote:
Originally posted by ozzy6900
I want to know how to eject or restrict a player for throwing his bat in FED. I thought that this was a local rule from some LL field!
If a player doesn't know how to control their bat, they don't need to be playing baseball at any level!
__________________
"A picture is worth a thousand words".
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Fri Apr 22, 2005, 02:06pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,729
Ozzy

While it is a LL "type" rule actually there are two references in FED. 1) for intentionally throwing a bat or helmet and 2) carelessly throwing a bat.

While no "real" umpire would call anything concerned with this in a FED game an UMPIRE COULD stretch things to do it if he wanted.

Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Fri Apr 22, 2005, 02:28pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,129
Quote:
Originally posted by ozzy6900
I want to know how to eject or restrict a player for throwing his bat in FED. I thought that this was a local rule from some LL field!
Follow the directives in 3-3-1b and 3-3-1m.

I've used both in my career (once each, iirc).

Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old Fri Apr 22, 2005, 02:30pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 224
Send a message via AIM to akalsey Send a message via Yahoo to akalsey
Quote:
I vaguely remember an "exceptional substitution" rule which allows another player already in the lineup to return in a different spot if an injury or disqualification takes place, and no other players are available
That sounds a lot like a Little League rule.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:10pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1