|
|||
High Fives
I'd go with a team warning if any of them come out without helmets one (even though the ball is in dead-ball territory) - provided the knucklehead batter doesn't stop running and a teammate has to point him to the plate in which case there would be a problem. I'd not take a home run away for exuberance, although I'd remind them that if they did it during a live ball they could be costing their team a run.
|
|
|||
High Fives
No, not overly officious. Just anticipating what happens later in the game when a runner slips going around third on a live ball drive to right and the coach picks him up. Touching is touching. The POINT was, let the players know what COULD happen. As I said, I'd do nothing in the dead-ball homerun situation except let them consider the impact of running out of the dugout on a LIVE BALL.
|
|
|||
Yes, OOO
"Team warning" when they aren't even doing something covered by the rule - you noted, yourself, that the ball is not live.
Threatening to "take away" a run if "touching" happens during a live ball [the rule prohibits assisting a runner, not touching]. Getting your shorts in a tangle over a situation that "might" happen a couple of innings later when an actual rule gets violated, so you jump into a perfectly innocuous situation to coach the players so that the dreaded "coach assist @ 3d" doesn't happen. That is the very definition of an Officially Officious Official. |
|
|||
Live Ball
Well, the mark of a good official is taking constructive criticism and remembering it - versus remembering the missed call. You're right. Both of you. Leave the "in case" and let the kids have fun. That's what the game should be about.
Thanks for the professionalism in your responses. And thanks for your insights! |
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
GB |
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
GB |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
|
||||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Quote:
Some amateur coaches were playing in NCAA when there was a severe penalty for the action you describe. Beginning in 1983, the home runner hitter was out when anyone other than the base coach touched him before he touched the plate. (7-11x) In 1984 they tweaked it a little by adding "after a warning, the batter is out...," etc. In 1999, the NCAA dropped that statute (7-11x is no longer in the book) and replaced it with: For the action you describe: Warning first offense; ejection, subsequent offenses. (5-2d) BTW: They also added that other than "preceding base runners" no team member could be on the dirt at home plate. The penalty: Warning first offense; second offense, ejection of "one of the offending players." That's still the rule in NCAA! You never mentioned the level of play, so those who rushed to say there is no penalty could be wrong. Lah, me, everyone is an expert these days. I suppose I had better start reading The Forum daily. (grin) One thing's sure: The question is not an OOO. In my area, coaches do not permit their players to violate the [non-existent FED] rule. I am always amused when I hear a coach scream: "Stay off the dirt!" It happened in my game Tuesday night. Both coaches had played at the local D1 school. Personally, I think it would be a positive move for FED to adopt it as well. Some teams visiting in our area clog up the third-base line after a home run. The home team coach always hustles out to demand we enforce the penalty and becomes quite disgruntled when he finds there isn't one. |
|
|||
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Carl Childress
Quote:
__________________
GB |
|
|||
[QUOTE]Originally posted by GarthB
Quote:
|
Bookmarks |
|
|