The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Mon Aug 02, 2004, 03:52pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 4,222
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: OK,

Quote:
Originally posted by jumpmaster
Quote:
Originally posted by Rich Fronheiser
Quote:
Originally posted by bob jenkins
Quote:
Originally posted by jumpmaster

I don't have my FED rule book with me, but I believe the HBT is an ejection in FED baseball.
When you get your rules book, please provide a reference.

Thanks.

That would involve opening and reading.
Rich - don't go there. You have no idea how much time I spend in the rule book. But since you brought it up, as it is now August, I haven't looked at a FED rulebook since May. However, I have spent about 30 minutes a day in my OBR rule book this summer. During the FED season, I do the same in my FED rulebook. I will pull out my FED book tonight and post my answer. If I am wrong - I will eat crow.

As for this whole balk/no balk conversation - I pulled this info off the J/R website - http://www.rulesofbaseball.com/versions.html

“It is a balk if a pitcher does not have the ball but assists in a try to deceive a runner by


being on or astride the rubber, [8.05 Approved Ruling-a]
feigning a pitching position or pitch [8.05i], or
putting the rosin bag in his glove to make it appear he has the ball.

This is known as the ‘hidden ball trick.’ It is not necessarily a balk if a pitcher in this situation is on the dirt of the mound. [NFHS 6-2-5] [NCAA 9-3f]”

From
The Rules of Professional Baseball
By Jaksa and Roder


The NFHS and NCAA rule references indicate that it may be a balk if a pitcher is on the dirt of the mound during the hidden ball trick in a high school or NCAA game. Here are the NFHS and NCAA rule differences that you would find in the appendix:


NFHS 6-2-5 requires a balk if the pitcher is within 5 feet of the pitching rubber without the ball.
NCAA 9-3f requires a balk if the pitcher steps onto the dirt of the pitching mound without the ball.
The J/R quote has been brought up before and Rick Roder has, in an old email, I believe, agreed that it is predicated on the ball being live.

The same applies to the FED and NCAA situations. They are predicated on a live ball. There is no balk when the ball is dead.

Why is this so hard to understand?


__________________
GB
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Mon Aug 02, 2004, 04:48pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,729
Yep, Garth . . .

As we all know these examples are related to live ball situations.

This thread started with a simple issue:

After a dead ball is it possible to have a hidden ball trick?

The answer is elementary:

No, as it is impossible to make a ball live without the proper procedure. It is impossible to have a balk with a dead ball and the ball cannot be placed into live action without proper steps.

This simply gives us one of the TWO examples of "do overs" in baseball.

I don't think people "don't get it," I just think they want to swim upstream against authoritive opinion.

And Peter, we know you hit my response square on the head. A Home run!

Tee



[Edited by Tim C on Aug 2nd, 2004 at 05:50 PM]
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Mon Aug 02, 2004, 04:49pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Bentonville, AR
Posts: 461
Send a message via AIM to jumpmaster Send a message via MSN to jumpmaster Send a message via Yahoo to jumpmaster
Re: Re: Re: Re: OK,

Quote:
Originally posted by bob jenkins
Quote:
Originally posted by jumpmaster

I don't have my FED rule book with me, but I believe the HBT is an ejection in FED baseball.
When you get your rules book, please provide a reference.

Thanks.

My mistake. I was thinking of the fake tag provision - FED 3-3-1a. I can't find anything about the HBT.

[QUOTE] originally posted by GarthB
The J/R quote has been brought up before and Rick Roder has, in an old email, I believe, agreed that it is predicated on the ball being live.

I wasn't aware of the Roder comments...just trying to add to the argument, based on additional comments I have seen.

In my opinion - no balk w/out putting the ball in play. Can't put the ball in play unless the provisions in rule 5-1-4 are satisfied.
__________________
Alan Roper

Stand your ground. Don't fire unless fired upon, but if they mean to have a war, let it begin here - CPT John Parker, April 19, 1775, Lexington, Mass
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Tue Aug 03, 2004, 08:34am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,193
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: OK,

Quote:
Originally posted by GarthB

Why is this so hard to understand?


Theory: Because people can't believe that the defense can do something "wrong" without a penalty.

Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Tue Aug 03, 2004, 12:58pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Newburgh NY
Posts: 1,822
Re: Yep, Garth . . .

Originally posted by Tim C

I don't think people "don't get it," I just think they want to swim upstream against authoritive opinion.

And Peter, we know you hit my response square on the head. A Home run!

Tee


Common TEE we have all called a dead ball balk. (BIG GRIN!) The game is going on 3 hours, Temps in the 90's Game winning run on third and in our heads we hear that familiar ballpark voice " BEER HERE! BEER HERE!. I've got a Dead ball balk, game over, time to go and get some AC and a cold one.

Pete Booth



__________________
Peter M. Booth
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:26pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1