![]() |
|
|||
I tend to agree; why penalize the offense for a defensive violation? But there were those of the opinion that the last clause, returning the batter, should prevail over the first clause, when we post-gamed it. NFHS Softball lacks the clause about awarding/allowing the runner's advance, and allows advance only when forced if obstruction is enforced.
Does anyone have handy earlier years' NFHS baseball rules to see if the current wording has changed recently? And perhaps other codes may not have caught up? Upon reading Bob J's observation about its purpose, it does read like there might have been the addition to address the very situation Bob notes. |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
2016 NCAA Rule Change: OBS - "About to Receive" vs. "In the act of Catching" | teebob21 | Softball | 15 | Wed Mar 02, 2016 10:16pm |
Is "the patient whistle" and "possession consequence" ruining the game? | fiasco | Basketball | 46 | Fri Dec 02, 2011 08:43am |
Batter-runner overruns 1st base, makes an "attempt" to go to 2nd.... | Stevetheump | Softball | 28 | Sat Jan 30, 2010 11:16am |
ABC's "Nightline" examines "worst calls ever" tonight | pizanno | Basketball | 27 | Fri Jul 04, 2008 06:08am |
An attempt to draw attention from the "85% missed this one" thread | dash_riprock | Baseball | 21 | Sat Feb 23, 2008 03:11am |