View Single Post
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Tue May 30, 2017, 03:56pm
bob jenkins bob jenkins is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,136
Quote:
Originally Posted by PandaBear View Post
I tend to agree; why penalize the offense for a defensive violation? But there were those of the opinion that the last clause, returning the batter, should prevail over the first clause, when we post-gamed it. NFHS Softball lacks the clause about awarding/allowing the runner's advance, and allows advance only when forced if obstruction is enforced.

Does anyone have handy earlier years' NFHS baseball rules to see if the current wording has changed recently? And perhaps other codes may not have caught up? Upon reading Bob J's observation about its purpose, it does read like there might have been the addition to address the very situation Bob notes.
The wording hasn't changed; and the other codes have the same interp.

In your OP, there's no "automatic" advance for R3 -- he wasn't advancing at the time of the CI. So the coach gets a choice -- the penalty (BR to grist, R3 returns) or the play (BR out, R3 scores).
Reply With Quote