Pete, Bob need your help

[SNIPERBBB]

Sounds like confusion with the courtesy runner rule.

[bob jenkins]

Originally Posted by SNIPERBBB

Sounds like confusion with the courtesy runner rule.

Agreed. There used to be some people who (mis-)interpreted the CR rule to the effect that if a CR was in and the offense batted around, that the original F1 or F2 could not bat again.

That was clarified last year or this to the sensible conclusion that F1 or F2 could bat and the CR could again run.

[Robert E. Harrison]

Some State Interpreters were saying that a CR could not be used 2 times in the same inning. That was the reason for the clarification.

[thumpferee]

Originally Posted by bob jenkins

Agreed. There used to be some people who (mis-)interpreted the CR rule to the effect that if a CR was in and the offense batted around, that the original F1 or F2 could not bat again.

That was clarified last year or this to the sensible conclusion that F1 or F2 could bat and the CR could again run.

I FOUND IT!

CR
#5. May not be a CR and then be used as a sub in that half inning.

[bob jenkins]

Originally Posted by thumpferee

I FOUND IT!

CR
#5. May not be a CR and then be used as a sub in that half inning.

That rule does not describe the situation you wrote in your OP.