![]() |
|
|
|||
Rule wording and the wording in the POE do not match up.
POE wording says in 3-3-1 "we are provided tools to issue a written warning, THEN (emphasis added) restriction...." 3-3-1 says it's a restriction WHEN the written warning is given. |
|
|||
A rule or policy can be considered a tool. It's a way to restrict a coach and the procedure for doing it.
|
|
|||
In Ohio I was told that a coach's written warning for 3-3-1 violations is concurrent with his restriction. Team written warnings for 3-3-1 violations (a. team personnel outside the dugout, b. fake tag, c. careless throwing of the bat, d. jewelry or bandanas, e. hitting fungo after the game starts) still need to be written, but do not carry a restriction for the coach.
OTO, other rules violations require a coach's restriction without a warning: e.g.; 3-2-1 (coach out of uniform) 3-2-4 (coach refuses to attend pre-game meeting) 4-1-3b. (use of illegal bat.) |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Poorly written / trick questions on umpire tests | Dakota | Softball | 25 | Tue Apr 01, 2014 06:56am |
Why is ASA 8-2-D written this way? | Dakota | Softball | 4 | Fri Feb 22, 2008 12:51pm |
study guide question written late at night? | just another ref | Basketball | 5 | Tue Oct 24, 2006 07:12pm |