Quote:
Originally Posted by kung
Adam & Ref16,
I do not see how you could agree that this should have been a no call. Are you saying that because the defender grabbed 90% of the shooters hand and touched 10% of the ball, this is a no call?
|
The hand was on the ball, right?
Plus:
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRutledge
I thought this was not a foul. It was not obviously a foul. It looks like the defender got to the ball first and any other contact would be incidental. I would not be happy personally if I called a foul on this play after seeing it in slow motion replay. Again, that is why they call it judgment.
Peace
|