View Single Post
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Tue Dec 31, 2013, 09:50am
VaTerp VaTerp is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Earth- For Now
Posts: 872
Quote:
Originally Posted by bob jenkins View Post
Absent the injury, in NFHS the two players involved have to jump. That's why I'd have the sub jump.
That make sense.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Adam View Post
Agreed. In NFHS, the rule doesn't address the situation, but there is precedent to determine their intent. That precedent is with free throws, and it's clear they want the sub to shoot. I'm going that route and having the sub jump.
I disagree that substitutes for an injured free throw shooter is precedent here. I can agree with what Bob is saying in that absent the injury, NFHS would require the two original jumpers to jump again.

I don't think the FT situation is analogous.
Reply With Quote