Quote:
Originally Posted by maven
I talked about this issue with my umpire, who worked in another state for 15 years. We have no testing beyond the 2nd year, and as a result you have entire crews who last looked in a rule book in 1988.
So what's easier: implementing a system of testing and evaluation of football officials statewide (with something like 4500 officials), or empowering coaches to challenge officials on the rules during a game? We could (and likely will) do both, eventually, but in the short term I think the answer is clear.
I don't read what they're doing as "trying to do its own thing," at least not just change for its own sake. The Gold Book generally and this provision in particular are motivated by a good faith effort to improve the consistency, overall quality, and accountability of football officiating in Ohio.
And as much as we might quibble with this or that mechanic, I think the goal and approach are worthwhile.
|
I don't have a huge issue with the challenge itself, but with putting the onus on the officials to justify your calls by pointing out the rule when challenged.
Make the coach show you the rule if he thinks you're wrong.