[Freddy]

Question debated today at camp: "By rule, can an official consult the timer or scorer for input regarding whether a last second shot was released before the horn?"

Disclaimer: I know it might not always be wise to consult or heed the advise from the table. It's somewhat a travesty that they even need to be asked. What I want to know is this: it is permitted by rule?

All I can come up with is . . .
A) the NFHS document "Instructions to and Duties of the Timer for Basketball Games" which I distribute to new timers which says, "Near the End of Playing Time: 4. If a quarter or extra period ends and: c. The timing signal is not heard by the officials, testimony of the timer may determine whether a score shall count or a foul shall be charged, unless the referee has information which would alter the situation."
and
B) the Casebook which says: (2.13), SITUATION: the signal to end the fourth quarter cannot be heard by the officials. The table officials disagree as to whether the ball was in flight during a try for field goal when time expired . . . RULING: The final decision shall be made by the referee, and unless he/she has knowledge to alter the ruling, the goal shall count if it was successful . . .
and
C) the NFHS Officials' Manual, p.32, which says, "The Referee will make the final decision in case of disagreement or if it is necessary to consult the timer. The timer should only be consulted on a last-second tap or try when the red/LED light fails to illuminate and/or the timer's signal is not heard."

Ergo, it seems clear that the referee's final decision regarding a last second shot may consider information gained by asking the timer. Anything I'm missing in the rulebook on this issue?