Quote:
Originally Posted by Smitty
Not sure where you're going with this, but the conference would not be to confirm the player is bleeding. It would be to confer on what happened and whether they saw it or had any input. I may not confer at all and on my way to the table decide it was an intentional. Regardless, I think it would be fine based on the OP to upgrade the call after the initial call.
|
Ummm again...
Quote:
Originally Posted by tref
If my partners had no look or no whistle on the play, I dont need them to confirm that the player is bleeding.
|
I agree with the rest of what you say! I'm simply saying that blood in & of itself isnt a deciding factor on whether to upgrade or not. Thats all.
__________________
I gotta new attitude!
Last edited by tref; Thu Jan 26, 2012 at 02:04pm.
|