Quote:
Originally Posted by Welpe
The problem is, and you've done this before, is that you apply your personal standard to unsporting conduct and then refer to it as "what's right".
|
Fair enough. Here's where we separate fact from opinion.
What's right is that what was spoken is an imperative sentence. As we all know (but perhaps some have forgotten), an imperative sentence is a defined as an order or command, directed at someone (with "you" understood, and therefore typically left out of the sentence). To say that this is not an order is to ignore the definition. This is black and white.
What's opinion is whether an imperative sentence from a kid a T-able offense. If I'm reading everyone else correctly, the general opinion is that it's technically an order, but so what? Or, you have to take into context what the kid said. (I won't dispute the subjectivity in this area.)
Or, it's not an order at all. This is the objective point that I dispute.
I'm the only one here who believes an imperative sentence from a kid is a T-able offense. That's fine. But, like the rules and their definitions we discuss here, our language has rules, too. If you choose not to T up a kid for giving you an order, that's one thing. Just don't tell me it's not an order.