Quote:
Originally Posted by Gulf Coast Blue
If the runners foot was on top of F2's foot on top of the plate.......I am going to assume that some part of the runners foot touched the plate.
Joel
|
I think many umpires would do the same ("see" the touch or assume the touch of the plate)
However, aftrer further clarification (ASA, F2 did not have the ball), sounds like an obstruction call anyway...