Quote:
Originally Posted by tref
IDK mbyron... we have the accept/decline boxes for every game we are offered via Arbiter.
Personally, I check the accept box for any assignment offered, regardless of gender or level. Many of our Big Dawgs will not travel past certain limits or work a 2 person game or even work girls games.
Most assignors don't offer the more skilled officials girls games anyway, unless its part of a double-header.
We are required to work a certain amount of girls & lower-level games to be considered eligible for post-season.
All in all, I stick by my original comment. Lets face it unlike college & up, at the HS level they need us more than we need them.
|
I only turn games down do to scheduling conflicts I hadn't had a chance to block on arbiter.
In CO, officials have to work a certain number of girls games and a certain number of jv games to be eligible for post season. Most try to "double dip" on the requirement by working JV girls games.
The fact that some states have this as a requirement shows that the preference is widespread. Whether it's perception or not really doesn't matter, but there are some officials who would rather work a JH boys game than a varsity girls (or even a college women) game.
The only way this would be a Title IX issue would be if schools or assigners were offering bigger incentives for the boys games (higher fees, 3-whistle vs 2-whistle, etc.)