Quote:
Originally Posted by chymechowder
If you look at my posts, you'll see that I was always describing an invalid signal (even though I didn't specify that  ).
"single wave"
"ambiguous signal"
I wasn't trying to say that there should be a time window for a VALID signal.
I should have been more clear on that and actually specified invalid signal. What threw me was that I thought you were saying that so long as he gives any signal before touching the ball, then he's protected.
Sorry for the confusion and debating something over which we don't disagree, haha. |
OK, I'll go along with that. Though in my first post in the thread I said "signals fair catch," which of course refers to a valid signal. Why would anyone think that an invalid signal conferred any protection on R?