The problem is that OBR contains two contrary statements. One is 6.05(j):
"A batter is out when...After a third strike or after he hits a fair ball, [the batter] or first base is tagged before he touches first base."
By this test, the ball must beat the runner, so a "tie" would go to the runner.
The other is 7.01 (already quoted by dash, above)
"7.01 A runner acquires the right to an unoccupied base when he touches it before he is out."
By this test, the runner must beat the ball, so a "tie" would result in an out.
This is one of the 237 problems with OBR. By tradition, at every level the test implied in 7.01 is employed on the field: the runner must beat the ball.
FED rules do not contain the contraries: see 8-4-2(j).
__________________
Cheers,
mb
|