Quote:
Originally Posted by Robert Goodman
I think the problem there is with interpreting "has been". Some of you seem to think it refers to the entire down, while others think it refers to the time before there was a run that ended beyond the neutral zone. Given the context, I think the latter -- that if CoP occurred following a run that ended beyond the NZ, the spot is that of the end of that run. Otherwise it seems silly -- why would a team lose an advantageous enforcement spot just because following all that, a turnover occurred?
Robert
|
How could A have a run beyond the NZ
after they turn the ball over to B?