Thread: Balk
View Single Post
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jun 10, 2009, 10:37am
mbyron mbyron is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 7,620
FED should be ruled the same. We have 6-2-4(e):

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rule 6-2-4
Balk. If there is a runner or runners, any of the following acts by a
pitcher while he is touching the pitcher’s plate is a balk:
e. taking a hand off the ball while in a set position (6-1-3), unless he pitches
to the batter or throws to a base or he steps toward and feints a throw to
second or third base as in (b);
I would also argue that case 6.2.4D gives you an idea of the "considerable period of time" needed to get a balk for separating the hands without pitching.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Case 6.2.4D
6.2.4 SITUATION D: With a runner or runners on base, F1 assumes the set
position. He stretches his arms above his head, brings them down together and
pauses with the ball in both hands in front of the body after which he (a) separates
hands and then steps back off pitcher’s plate with pivot foot or (b) steps
back off pitcher’s plate with pivot foot and feints throw to unoccupied first.
RULING: In (a), this is a balk. In (b), this is legal.
As I understand it, in your situation F1 did not touch the ball nearly that long, nor did he come set before separating his hands.

FED rules do not include a valuable provision of OBR 8.05, but they should: when in doubt about a balk (and only then), determine whether the pitcher intended to deceive the runner.

I think that in your situation, all of these indicators point the same direction.
__________________
Cheers,
mb
Reply With Quote