Quote:
Originally Posted by BillyMac
Agree. If it's not illegal, it's legal.
Purpose and intent may handle it, but it's a stretch when the casebook play specifically, and only, mentions "backboard".
|
The casebook play also specifically states "the ball hits B's backboard and bounces
directly back to A1." Question: What if the ball hits B's backboard, then the ring and then to A1? Would it be legal for A1 to start a dribble? IMHO if A1 started a dribble I would rule a violation in all three situations (backboard only, backboard+ring, ring only) to be consistent in not giving A1 an unfair advantage not intended by the existing rule.