Quote:
Originally Posted by Camron Rust
... bring A1 back in to shoot the FT(s) ... you're bringing A1 back in to shoot the FTs ... A1 shoots A1's FTs unless A1 is injured or disqualified.
|
My additional new twist situation #3 is the only one in the thread that doesn't have A1 sitting the required tick.
Since two of the three situations have A1 sitting the required tick, let's move away from the "sit a tick" question in those two situations and discuss whether the substitute A6 is some type of "designated shooter" who, for some reason, has to shoot the free throws (except for for blood, disqualification, or injury).
While not disagreeing with Camron Rust, are there citations other than 2-3 (Referee's Authority), and Purpose and Intent, to support his interpretation?
2-3 (Referee's Authority) and Purpose and Intent are pretty good citations, but are there more?