Quote:
Originally Posted by BillyMac
Please offer how the NFHS rule change impacts a play other than the "unusual interpretation"...[/I]
|
It can't. This wording won't allow any change but for that misguided 2006-07 and 2017-18 Interpretation:
"An EXCEPTION added to the backcourt violation (9-9-1): To ensure that an offensive team is not unfairly penalized when the ball is deflected by the defense from the frontcourt to the backcourt. This exception allows the offense to recover the ball (
that still has frontcourt status) in the backcourt without penalty." ("Basketball Comments on the Rules", May 17, 2018)
By stating that they're applying this only to a deflected ball "that still has frontcourt status," this change cannot go as far as the NCAA-M did as their backcourt rule was revised last year to say, "Art. 5. A pass or any other loose ball in the front court that is deflected by a defensive player, which causes the ball to go
into the backcourt may be recovered by either team even if the offense was the last to touch the ball before it went
into the backcourt."
Right?
Now watch them prove me wrong by coming out with an Interpretation or Casebook situation to the contrary.